Comments on: Nation Tries to Bring Sexy Back; Epic Fail

By: Vincent

Vincent — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 04:15:28 +0000

So edgy. Or something.

By: Sakaki

Sakaki — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:26:56 +0000

Nope. I have acknowledged the reality that there are shifts in the world, that we’re becoming more polarized as each year passes. And I not only exploit that for my own gain, but I use it against other people as well.

Sad? Nope. Insane? Fuck yes.

By: Vincent

Vincent — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:51:59 +0000

Well, that’s pretty fucking sad for you, innit?

By: Sakaki

Sakaki — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:55:15 +0000

Nope. I don’t think it’s tiresome at all. I think it’s a very apt statement about the polarized world in which we live.

By: Vincent

Vincent — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:57:53 +0000

Nate Gulley isn’t a perfect example of anything except a cynical, self-absorbed punk.

Don’t you think this whole Red Gang/Blue Gang thing is a bit tiresome, Sakaki?

By: Sakaki

Sakaki — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:36:40 +0000

The difference with the Red-Staters is that a lot of them are holding their nose and waiting for a while to see what will happen with McCain. They aren’t going to him with open arms and wet pants (Unless they’re over 75, then they just can’t help it.)

A perfect example of a Blue-Stater as I have described is, of course, Nate Gulley, who is so devoid of life in his brain that if someone smashed his head open with a baseball bat, that there wouldn’t be anything inside.

By: Boobie

Boobie — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:56:01 +0000

I won’t argue against the idiocy of the “Blue-Stater,” but I do wonder if that is an effective way to distinguish them from the “Red-Stater.” At least by quantity they seem fairly equal, I suppose it’s the quality of the idiocy that counts…

Obama did get me wet in the pants over the windfall tax issue back in the Obama v. Hillary days of so long ago. The reason being that he wasn’t advocating for the economically unfeasible fantasy of lowering the gas tax and implementing a windfall profit tax to make up the difference in revenue in order to lower gas prices. Point being, the dude may have mad blue state appeal, getting the Nation folks all hot and bothered, but he hasn’t let it limit him.

At least I hope (without audacity). In regards to Obama I’ve already came and cleaned up. Which sucks since it’s just now that the Nation’s genre of political erotica about Obama is coming into it’s full sauciness!

By: Sakaki

Sakaki — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:02:52 +0000

Braden, it’s because those in the blue states who follow politics and vote are usually void of any comprehension of the consequences of their actions. Specifically, one pure sign of this is the idea that taxing oil companies with a windfall profits tax will actually lower our gas prices. Blue Staters believe this, though it logically falls flat on it’s face.

In regards to Oblama (sic), most of these blue-staters are in a very similar vein as those who voted for John F. Kennedy back in 1960. Now, the difference between them is that while Kennedy had a military background (PT-109), and some actual knowledge about the office he was running for, Oblama does not. BUT, because he looks good and is not George W. Bush (who isn’t running, but all Blue-Staters seem to think he is [ala Clinton through Gore in 2000]), the idiots will vote for him. Including most of the great washed masses at the University of Oregon.

The Nation is the mouthpiece for the Blue-State idiots. Pure and simple.

By: Michelle Haley

Michelle Haley — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:01:58 +0000

Braden, they probably just vote like I do.

By: Braden

Braden — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:52:35 +0000

How is the concept of a president beign elected due entirely to sex appeal not horrifying to these people?