Comments on: Waiting on Con Court

By: Ossie

Ossie — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:14:26 +0000

you guys are perverts, Emily is a sweet, stong independent female. You get out of here.

By: Sakaki

Sakaki — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:33:26 +0000

If you like used goods, go for it.

By: Guy

Guy — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:42:50 +0000

I’d hit it.

By: Sean

Sean — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:05:40 +0000

But she’s so cute.

By: Ossie

Ossie — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:10:57 +0000

That sounds like a violation of the Robert’s Rules of Order. How could something so obviously wrong like that happen in our esteemed ASUO government?

By: A concerned Libertarian

A concerned Libertarian — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:10:06 +0000

Remember the June meeting of 2007…she asks the senate to review Diego Hernandez and they reject him. Her next three appointees are approved. Given voting power, the three new senators call for a re-vote and, this time, a secured majority ensures that Hernandez gets in. She was trying to pack the ASUO Senate with a bunch of former PAC-8 candidates that she made backhanded deals with.

And yes…she has had over 6 months and she still has several positions open. She doesn’t pay attention to rules or ethics, but she has no problem complaining about everyone else. And like most executives, all we are left asking is…what has she done since taking office.

By: Ossie

Ossie — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:58:40 +0000

You know, you can just call her a big hypocrit, the fucking part doesn’t add much to your point. Just trying to tidy up.

By: duh

duh — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:04:54 +0000

ahhh…I know why!

Because she hasn’t appointed about 12 positions yet and is in constitutional non-fulfillment, but still has the nerves to complain about the Court AND take credit for everything???

By: duh

duh — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:00:09 +0000

oh please do explain more…

By: A concerned Libertarian

A concerned Libertarian — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:07:42 +0000

Emily McLain is the biggest fucking hypocrit i have seen in a long while…