<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Like Deb Frisch? You&#8217;ll Love This&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/</link>
	<description>Free Minds, Free Markets, Free Booze</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:08:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oregon Commentator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Law and Order: Deb Frisch Unit</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/comment-page-2/#comment-104106</link>
		<dc:creator>Oregon Commentator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Law and Order: Deb Frisch Unit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/#comment-104106</guid>
		<description>[...] catch up on all the Frisch fun, check out the archive. There&#8217;s also the Deb Frisch comic, which is one of the best things the Commentator has ever run in its 25 year history. If you want [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] catch up on all the Frisch fun, check out the archive. There&#8217;s also the Deb Frisch comic, which is one of the best things the Commentator has ever run in its 25 year history. If you want [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent.</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/comment-page-2/#comment-94980</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 02:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/#comment-94980</guid>
		<description>Sulla:

I just died a little bit inside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sulla:</p>
<p>I just died a little bit inside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G-Dub</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/comment-page-2/#comment-94978</link>
		<dc:creator>G-Dub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/#comment-94978</guid>
		<description>Brother Jeb used to preach on the pentacrest at the Univ. of Iowa.  I always liked the way he shouted &quot;MAS-TUR-BATION!&quot;  After awhile the crowd would join in and a good time was had by all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brother Jeb used to preach on the pentacrest at the Univ. of Iowa.  I always liked the way he shouted &#8220;MAS-TUR-BATION!&#8221;  After awhile the crowd would join in and a good time was had by all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sulla</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/comment-page-2/#comment-94976</link>
		<dc:creator>sulla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/#comment-94976</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Actually you illustrate a point of why so-called “atheists” are just pagans worshiping idols.&lt;/b&gt;

Haha. In the year 2007, what the hell does this even mean anymore?&lt;/i&gt;


Here is just one example:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFpQKnnBLnk

(hey, you asked...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><b>Actually you illustrate a point of why so-called “atheists” are just pagans worshiping idols.</b></p>
<p>Haha. In the year 2007, what the hell does this even mean anymore?</i></p>
<p>Here is just one example:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFpQKnnBLnk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFpQKnnBLnk</a></p>
<p>(hey, you asked&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/comment-page-2/#comment-94975</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/#comment-94975</guid>
		<description>“anymore than you can use science to prove/disprove Christianity.”
Yes, but if you had scientific proof that a man named Jesus Christ was born from a virgin and was resurrected you would hop on that.
This is the standard “NOMA” argument (Non-Overlapping Magisteria, the claim that Science and Religion occupy separate ‘realms’ of human knowledge).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“anymore than you can use science to prove/disprove Christianity.”<br />
Yes, but if you had scientific proof that a man named Jesus Christ was born from a virgin and was resurrected you would hop on that.<br />
This is the standard “NOMA” argument (Non-Overlapping Magisteria, the claim that Science and Religion occupy separate ‘realms’ of human knowledge).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/comment-page-2/#comment-94974</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/#comment-94974</guid>
		<description>&quot;anymore than you can use science to prove/disprove Christianity.&quot;
Yes, but if you had scientific proof that a man named Jesus Christ was born from a virgin and was resurrected you would hop on that.
This is the standard &quot;NOMA&quot; (Non-Overlapping Magisteria, the claim that Science and Religion occupy separate &#039;realms&#039; of human knowledge).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;anymore than you can use science to prove/disprove Christianity.&#8221;<br />
Yes, but if you had scientific proof that a man named Jesus Christ was born from a virgin and was resurrected you would hop on that.<br />
This is the standard &#8220;NOMA&#8221; (Non-Overlapping Magisteria, the claim that Science and Religion occupy separate &#8216;realms&#8217; of human knowledge).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/comment-page-2/#comment-94973</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/#comment-94973</guid>
		<description>Deb is going to a very special hell, Brights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deb is going to a very special hell, Brights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brights</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/comment-page-2/#comment-94972</link>
		<dc:creator>Brights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/#comment-94972</guid>
		<description>Nice surprise. Profanity. Pointing-out-typos. Such &quot;rational&quot; arguments here... 

&quot;You can’t prove or disprove a method.&quot;

Exactly...which is why you have operate under the FAITH that it works. You can&#039;t use science to prove/disprove the truth of the scientific method anymore than you can use science to prove/disprove Christianity.  We can approach both of them under the catagory of &quot;reasonable faith.&quot;  

Thank you for proving my point.  

As a Christian, I can explain the existance of things like love, or morality, or reason, or logic, or sin, or the purpose of our lives and the universe. You can tell me how my coffee maker produces coffee. Of course I can do that too, as the Lord doesn&#039;t mind science (or coffee). But as a materialist, you are stuck being a dishonest hypocrite anytime you ever have had a strong opinion about an abstract concept that wasn&#039;t made up of matter (oops, I guess &quot;reason&quot; or &quot;methods&quot; are not made up of matter either, so you are out of luck). And since you can&#039;t measure &quot;honesty&quot; in a test tube or prove it with science,  I&#039;m not sure why you care anyway.

I&#039;ll say &quot;Hi&quot; to Brother Jeb when I make my arrival.  He might be a tad annoying, but it beats the alternative.  Can you say &quot;Hi&quot; to Deb Frisch when you see her for all eternity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice surprise. Profanity. Pointing-out-typos. Such &#8220;rational&#8221; arguments here&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8220;You can’t prove or disprove a method.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly&#8230;which is why you have operate under the FAITH that it works. You can&#8217;t use science to prove/disprove the truth of the scientific method anymore than you can use science to prove/disprove Christianity.  We can approach both of them under the catagory of &#8220;reasonable faith.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Thank you for proving my point.  </p>
<p>As a Christian, I can explain the existance of things like love, or morality, or reason, or logic, or sin, or the purpose of our lives and the universe. You can tell me how my coffee maker produces coffee. Of course I can do that too, as the Lord doesn&#8217;t mind science (or coffee). But as a materialist, you are stuck being a dishonest hypocrite anytime you ever have had a strong opinion about an abstract concept that wasn&#8217;t made up of matter (oops, I guess &#8220;reason&#8221; or &#8220;methods&#8221; are not made up of matter either, so you are out of luck). And since you can&#8217;t measure &#8220;honesty&#8221; in a test tube or prove it with science,  I&#8217;m not sure why you care anyway.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say &#8220;Hi&#8221; to Brother Jeb when I make my arrival.  He might be a tad annoying, but it beats the alternative.  Can you say &#8220;Hi&#8221; to Deb Frisch when you see her for all eternity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/comment-page-2/#comment-94971</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/#comment-94971</guid>
		<description>&quot;Chrisitan (sic) faith has ALWAYS been based on reason, as God is pefectily (sic) rational&quot;

Wow, what a convincing tautology, BBS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Chrisitan (sic) faith has ALWAYS been based on reason, as God is pefectily (sic) rational&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow, what a convincing tautology, BBS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ Ciaramella</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/comment-page-2/#comment-94970</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ Ciaramella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/06/08/like-deb-frisch-youll-love-this/#comment-94970</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s it, Brights-B-Scared. I&#039;m fucking done. Every sentence you write is so full of factual errors and logical fallacies that it would take all day to address them. But before I leave you to wallow in this rhetorical shithole you have created, allow me to address one last thing:

&quot;Science starts with a scientifically unsupportable position. As I already mentioned, you can’t prove the scientific method in a lab.&quot;

No. Good science starts with NO position. The scientific method isn&#039;t a fucking position. It&#039;s a method, as the name happens to imply. You can&#039;t prove or disprove a method. Furthermore, I don&#039;t have faith in the scientific method. Neither do scientists. That&#039;s why they continually try and disprove the results of their experiments. You and your ilk, however, only try to reinforce your beliefs with layer upon layer of dogma and circular logic.

Alright, peace out. Have fun hangin&#039; with Brother Jed for the rest of eternity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s it, Brights-B-Scared. I&#8217;m fucking done. Every sentence you write is so full of factual errors and logical fallacies that it would take all day to address them. But before I leave you to wallow in this rhetorical shithole you have created, allow me to address one last thing:</p>
<p>&#8220;Science starts with a scientifically unsupportable position. As I already mentioned, you can’t prove the scientific method in a lab.&#8221;</p>
<p>No. Good science starts with NO position. The scientific method isn&#8217;t a fucking position. It&#8217;s a method, as the name happens to imply. You can&#8217;t prove or disprove a method. Furthermore, I don&#8217;t have faith in the scientific method. Neither do scientists. That&#8217;s why they continually try and disprove the results of their experiments. You and your ilk, however, only try to reinforce your beliefs with layer upon layer of dogma and circular logic.</p>
<p>Alright, peace out. Have fun hangin&#8217; with Brother Jed for the rest of eternity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
