<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Food for Thought</title>
	<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/</link>
	<description>Free Minds, Free Markets, Free Booze</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94339</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 20:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94339</guid>
		<description>The gold standard? No. Listen, I'm not going to be like the dudes over at Hit and Run who have raging hard-ons for Paul because he was once a libertarian presidential nominee. I know that many of his ideas are fucking ridiculous (like his Tancredo-like policy on immigration)

Still, you've got to admit that he's more fiscally responsible than much of the Republican leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gold standard? No. Listen, I&#8217;m not going to be like the dudes over at Hit and Run who have raging hard-ons for Paul because he was once a libertarian presidential nominee. I know that many of his ideas are fucking ridiculous (like his Tancredo-like policy on immigration)</p>
<p>Still, you&#8217;ve got to admit that he&#8217;s more fiscally responsible than much of the Republican leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94338</link>
		<dc:creator>Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 20:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94338</guid>
		<description>I don't think it's a coincidence that many of the Republican presidential hopefulls have been called RINO before, considering the term has been used to narrow "Republicanism" to a point where it has become divorced from it's ideological heritage, reality and practicality. A non-RINO will not win the nomination, let alone the whole enchilada, and as a country we're better off for it. As Olly points out, since we have only two parties, they had better be pretty inclusive... the rise of the RINOs will (hopefully) bring back some tolerance/sanity to the Republican party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a coincidence that many of the Republican presidential hopefulls have been called RINO before, considering the term has been used to narrow &#8220;Republicanism&#8221; to a point where it has become divorced from it&#8217;s ideological heritage, reality and practicality. A non-RINO will not win the nomination, let alone the whole enchilada, and as a country we&#8217;re better off for it. As Olly points out, since we have only two parties, they had better be pretty inclusive&#8230; the rise of the RINOs will (hopefully) bring back some tolerance/sanity to the Republican party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisD</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94337</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 17:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94337</guid>
		<description>Oh, right.  I guess forgot about all of those studies that correlate diet with effectiveness as an elected official.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, right.  I guess forgot about all of those studies that correlate diet with effectiveness as an elected official.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94336</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 14:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94336</guid>
		<description>"I mean, they eat beef! That means they can, like, defend America!!!"-ChrisD

Hmmm compared to some vegan hippie? Probably yeah I would put money on that saying yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I mean, they eat beef! That means they can, like, defend America!!!&#8221;-ChrisD</p>
<p>Hmmm compared to some vegan hippie? Probably yeah I would put money on that saying yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olly</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94335</link>
		<dc:creator>Olly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 09:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94335</guid>
		<description>"I imagine this is because this whole concept of “fiscal responsibility” that Paul professes is not a pillar of republican party politics anymore."

I know it's de rigeur to pile on the Republicans nowadays - because god forbid both national parties get to be broad churches - but even so, Tyler, do you really regard a &lt;a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul53.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;return to the gold standard&lt;/a&gt; as "fiscally responsible"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I imagine this is because this whole concept of “fiscal responsibility” that Paul professes is not a pillar of republican party politics anymore.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s de rigeur to pile on the Republicans nowadays - because god forbid both national parties get to be broad churches - but even so, Tyler, do you really regard a <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul53.html" rel="nofollow">return to the gold standard</a> as &#8220;fiscally responsible&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisD</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94334</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 07:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94334</guid>
		<description>Whether a r(h?)ino or not, I'm totally impressed with how butch all of the Republican eating habits are!!  I mean, they eat beef!  That means they can, like, defend America!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether a r(h?)ino or not, I&#8217;m totally impressed with how butch all of the Republican eating habits are!!  I mean, they eat beef!  That means they can, like, defend America!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94330</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 04:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94330</guid>
		<description>That's not necessarily true, Anthony. A Republican In Name Only can be any republican who goes against the grain of his party. It's a rather nebulous term, and it has been applied to Paul on numerous occasions in the past; I imagine this is because this whole concept of "fiscal responsibility" that Paul professes is not a pillar of republican party politics anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not necessarily true, Anthony. A Republican In Name Only can be any republican who goes against the grain of his party. It&#8217;s a rather nebulous term, and it has been applied to Paul on numerous occasions in the past; I imagine this is because this whole concept of &#8220;fiscal responsibility&#8221; that Paul professes is not a pillar of republican party politics anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94329</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 03:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94329</guid>
		<description>How is that CJ?  a rino is slang for a LIBERAL republican...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is that CJ?  a rino is slang for a LIBERAL republican&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ Ciaramella</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94323</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ Ciaramella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 20:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94323</guid>
		<description>I think you just answered your own question, actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you just answered your own question, actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94319</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 18:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94319</guid>
		<description>How exactly is Ron Paul a rino?  Ron Paul is more conservative than any of the the GOP candidates running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How exactly is Ron Paul a rino?  Ron Paul is more conservative than any of the the GOP candidates running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94294</link>
		<dc:creator>Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 20:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94294</guid>
		<description>How's &lt;a href="http://conservativehome.blogs.com/torydiary/images/7496_512.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;Huckabee&lt;/a&gt; gonna keep the weight off eating those ribeyes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;s <a href="http://conservativehome.blogs.com/torydiary/images/7496_512.jpg" rel="nofollow">Huckabee</a> gonna keep the weight off eating those ribeyes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simg</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94293</link>
		<dc:creator>Simg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94293</guid>
		<description>Ron Paul is the best Rino ever. I hope Paul and Gavel get the nominations, it'd be real horror show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul is the best Rino ever. I hope Paul and Gavel get the nominations, it&#8217;d be real horror show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94276</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 01:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94276</guid>
		<description>I like Fred Thompson's answer: "The Democrat's Head".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Fred Thompson&#8217;s answer: &#8220;The Democrat&#8217;s Head&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94274</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 00:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94274</guid>
		<description>I like Brownback's response- BEEF. haha so simple and to the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Brownback&#8217;s response- BEEF. haha so simple and to the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sho</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94270</link>
		<dc:creator>Sho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 22:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/05/09/food-for-thought/#comment-94270</guid>
		<description>Apparently, Tancredo is too much of a man to even get near a stove (he'll just unwittingly hire an illegal immigrant to cook for him).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, Tancredo is too much of a man to even get near a stove (he&#8217;ll just unwittingly hire an illegal immigrant to cook for him).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
