<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Jihad on E.T.</title>
	<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/</link>
	<description>Free Minds, Free Markets, Free Booze</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94055</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94055</guid>
		<description>Grammar is teh sux0rz!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grammar is teh sux0rz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94054</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94054</guid>
		<description>Tsk Tsk. I use the Chicago Manual of Style, Ted. And we all know that in its online form it's spelled "pwned."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tsk Tsk. I use the Chicago Manual of Style, Ted. And we all know that in its online form it&#8217;s spelled &#8220;pwned.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94049</link>
		<dc:creator>Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94049</guid>
		<description>Damn... Here I've brought up my favorite topic, and yet I've still been totally owned. 

Oh shit, and now I'm not even sure if one capitalizes after an ellipses. It's too bad I'm way to lazy to grab my trusty AP style book, because now I'm going to have to live with that gnawing feeling of doubt in the pit of my stomach.





Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn&#8230; Here I&#8217;ve brought up my favorite topic, and yet I&#8217;ve still been totally owned. </p>
<p>Oh shit, and now I&#8217;m not even sure if one capitalizes after an ellipses. It&#8217;s too bad I&#8217;m way to lazy to grab my trusty AP style book, because now I&#8217;m going to have to live with that gnawing feeling of doubt in the pit of my stomach.</p>
<p>Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94048</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94048</guid>
		<description>Now you know how we feel whenever we get bounced around due to "copy editing" complaints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you know how we feel whenever we get bounced around due to &#8220;copy editing&#8221; complaints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94047</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94047</guid>
		<description>Ugh! Mom's = Mom has. Do I need to loan you a book on grammar? In English, with which we are all ostensibly familiar, the apostrophe marks omissions and denotes possesion.*

*Note: Sorry, I'm a little annoyed is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh! Mom&#8217;s = Mom has. Do I need to loan you a book on grammar? In English, with which we are all ostensibly familiar, the apostrophe marks omissions and denotes possesion.*</p>
<p>*Note: Sorry, I&#8217;m a little annoyed is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94046</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94046</guid>
		<description>Upon further inspection, Ted, what the fuck does your comment mean? We haven't talked about "copy-editing" because it's copy editing without a hyphen (unless you're using British usage, in which case why not simply refer to it as sub-editing?). Vertebrate is spelled correctly, though maybe you're criticizing me for not using the correct plural, vertebrae. Please illuminate me as to my copy-editing transgressions. (I used  the phrase as an adjective modifier; score one for grammar!*)

*Note: It was still, arguably, unnecessary for me to use the hyphen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon further inspection, Ted, what the fuck does your comment mean? We haven&#8217;t talked about &#8220;copy-editing&#8221; because it&#8217;s copy editing without a hyphen (unless you&#8217;re using British usage, in which case why not simply refer to it as sub-editing?). Vertebrate is spelled correctly, though maybe you&#8217;re criticizing me for not using the correct plural, vertebrae. Please illuminate me as to my copy-editing transgressions. (I used  the phrase as an adjective modifier; score one for grammar!*)</p>
<p>*Note: It was still, arguably, unnecessary for me to use the hyphen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94045</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94045</guid>
		<description>Mom's? I see an 's with no relevance. AAAAAAGH! Must...not...smash...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mom&#8217;s? I see an &#8217;s with no relevance. AAAAAAGH! Must&#8230;not&#8230;smash&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94044</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94044</guid>
		<description>Your mom's talked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your mom&#8217;s talked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94043</link>
		<dc:creator>Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94043</guid>
		<description>"have vertebrate"?

Tyler, Tyler, Tyler... haven't we talked about copy-editing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;have vertebrate&#8221;?</p>
<p>Tyler, Tyler, Tyler&#8230; haven&#8217;t we talked about copy-editing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94041</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94041</guid>
		<description>Do vaginas have vertebrate? No, they do not. But, for most of us, they are already our overlords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do vaginas have vertebrate? No, they do not. But, for most of us, they are already our overlords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94039</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94039</guid>
		<description>But, if for formatting's sake, you do need to remove the link, no problem. 

Tim's comment just reminded me of that comic, and made me laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, if for formatting&#8217;s sake, you do need to remove the link, no problem. </p>
<p>Tim&#8217;s comment just reminded me of that comic, and made me laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94038</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94038</guid>
		<description>It's a joke. ^_-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a joke. ^_-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaser</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94037</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94037</guid>
		<description>Was that really necessary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was that really necessary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94036</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94036</guid>
		<description>You would, Zarflax.
&lt;a href="http://www.pbfcomics.com/?cid=0PBF41029BC-Nice_Try_Zarflax.jpg#43" rel="nofollow"&gt;
linky&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would, Zarflax.<br />
<a href="http://www.pbfcomics.com/?cid=0PBF41029BC-Nice_Try_Zarflax.jpg#43" rel="nofollow"><br />
linky</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94035</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94035</guid>
		<description>I, for one, welcome our new invertebrate overlords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, welcome our new invertebrate overlords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94034</link>
		<dc:creator>Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94034</guid>
		<description>Also Carl, I had more of a Red Dawn-meets- E.T. scenario in mind. 

WOLVERINES!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also Carl, I had more of a Red Dawn-meets- E.T. scenario in mind. </p>
<p>WOLVERINES!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94033</link>
		<dc:creator>Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94033</guid>
		<description>Also, in the interest of fairness, the authors have consulted for the DOD, but this book was printed privately. Not technically your tax dollars at work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, in the interest of fairness, the authors have consulted for the DOD, but this book was printed privately. Not technically your tax dollars at work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94032</link>
		<dc:creator>Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94032</guid>
		<description>OBEY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OBEY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94031</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94031</guid>
		<description>Just remember: Slim Whitman albums are your friend when dealing with aliens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just remember: Slim Whitman albums are your friend when dealing with aliens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Ciaramella</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94030</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Ciaramella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/04/25/the-jihad-on-et/#comment-94030</guid>
		<description>"Failure to prepare may mean mankind will have to dig in and fight with improvised weapons and hit-and-run tactics"

So, um, basically it will be like Battlefield Earth? I would be way more into a "They Live" scenario. When is a report going to be released on how to defend earth from the aliens already among us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Failure to prepare may mean mankind will have to dig in and fight with improvised weapons and hit-and-run tactics&#8221;</p>
<p>So, um, basically it will be like Battlefield Earth? I would be way more into a &#8220;They Live&#8221; scenario. When is a report going to be released on how to defend earth from the aliens already among us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
