<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Considers Bong Hits</title>
	<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/03/20/supreme-court-upholds-bong-hits/</link>
	<description>Free Minds, Free Markets, Free Booze</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/03/20/supreme-court-upholds-bong-hits/#comment-93111</link>
		<dc:creator>Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 05:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/03/20/supreme-court-upholds-bong-hits/#comment-93111</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I thought at the time that "upholds" sounded like something you could do with a bong rip. I swear it was funny at the time... I've changed it, though.

Danimal: you think it's just a coincidence that it's called "the highest court in the land"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I thought at the time that &#8220;upholds&#8221; sounded like something you could do with a bong rip. I swear it was funny at the time&#8230; I&#8217;ve changed it, though.</p>
<p>Danimal: you think it&#8217;s just a coincidence that it&#8217;s called &#8220;the highest court in the land&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danimal</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/03/20/supreme-court-upholds-bong-hits/#comment-93081</link>
		<dc:creator>Danimal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/03/20/supreme-court-upholds-bong-hits/#comment-93081</guid>
		<description>No matter what they decide, the First Amendment isn't going to start protecting bong hits.  I think Neidermeyer's title was actually referring to Scalia's legendary annual "Highbeas Tokus" party at Easthampton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what they decide, the First Amendment isn&#8217;t going to start protecting bong hits.  I think Neidermeyer&#8217;s title was actually referring to Scalia&#8217;s legendary annual &#8220;Highbeas Tokus&#8221; party at Easthampton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/03/20/supreme-court-upholds-bong-hits/#comment-92994</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 03:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/03/20/supreme-court-upholds-bong-hits/#comment-92994</guid>
		<description>Why did you title this post as if the Supreme Court has already decided? LIttle misleading, dontcha think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did you title this post as if the Supreme Court has already decided? LIttle misleading, dontcha think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
