Comments on: GULLEY TO FACE ETHICS HEARING: Student Senate Report 3/14/07

By: Evan

Evan — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:40:20 +0000

Levity?

By: Nick

Nick — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:29:01 +0000

Why are you talking like that?

By: Evan

Evan — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:53:52 +0000

That’s cool with me. But, like, don’t you like check facebook or anything? David and I are, like, SOOOO not even together anymore.

By: Nick

Nick — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:45:35 +0000

“It can’t be Wilbur, unless sometime since last year he lost the ability to form coherent sentences.”

Hey Evan, if you can’t understand me, and I can’t understand jokes, maybe you and I could take T’s reading comprehension lessons TOGETHER. That’s only if Goward wouldn’t mind. Wanna?

By: Doomscheissah

Doomscheissah — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 06:03:34 +0000

Hey, someone had to do it…so why not me?

By: Olly

Olly — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 05:25:52 +0000

Doomscheissah:

BRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBR
BRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBR

At long last, sir, have you no shame?

By: Doomscheissah

Doomscheissah — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 04:01:39 +0000

*blink* SO! Who’s up for a drink after midnight? I know *I* am.

By: Evan

Evan — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:04:32 +0000

Wait, which Nick is this? It can’t be Wilbur, unless sometime since last year he lost the ability to form coherent sentences. Plus, I thought Hudson already graduated, so he would no longer have to “get the hell out of here.”
I don’t know if “T” actually offers reading comprehension lessons. However, I bet “A Student” could teach you punctuation if you ask nicely. Anyway, the comment I “abstained” from saying was pretty much summed up Olly’s “morally neutral” comment a few posts back. However, instead of posting it and looking like an asshole, I wrapped it up in self-deprecation and tied it into this thread’s subject. As Ranier Wolfcastle would say, “that’s the joke.”
Crap, I forgot how to punctuate sentences that end in commas.

By: Nick

Nick — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:31:55 +0000

OK…you’re right. I’m in a hole. I don’t understand jokes. BUT HEY, AT LEAST I GET METAPHORS!!!!

By: David Goward, you motorboating son of a bitch

David Goward, you motorboating son of a bitch — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:35:45 +0000

I don’t think you need to be a moral authority to see that Nate Gulley is a douchebag but reading Goward’s letter to the editor made my skin crawl because he is such a sleezy person.

Nick: If your lack of being able to form a coherent argument leads me to believe that you are the vertically challenged Nick, you can join David Goward in the group of people that should graduate and get the hell out of here.

By: Doomscheissah

Doomscheissah — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:51:54 +0000

Olly: You were wrong.

BRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBR BRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBR

See?

By: Olly

Olly — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:05:12 +0000

Nick: when you’re in a hole, stop digging. (Alternatively, blame the Jews. Or was that a different Nick?)

Everyone else: let us at least be thankful that this thread has featured no “motorboating”.

And since when does a person have to be some kind of “moral authority” in order to point out that Nate Gulley is a ludicrous douchebag? It’s a morally neutral statement, and pretty hard to argue with.

By: Nick

Nick — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:15:23 +0000

Does “T” offer reading comprehension lessons?
You state that I made a false assumption by, I’m assuming, my comment that you are not, in fact, worried by conflicts of interst. I do understand, how you say, “jokes”, but I really wanted to point out that you once did make a fool of yourself with a conflict of interest and that now you used a ‘joke’ to avoid arguing against the comments in the post ‘Since when is David Goward a moral authority?’. I think it would be pretty hard to make that case. Is that why you avoided it with a “joke” about a conflict of interest?

By: Evan

Evan — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:52:30 +0000

You should take a lesson in reading comprehension from “T”, Nick. Do you know what a joke is? Stop making erroneous assumptions.

By: Timothy

Timothy — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:41:23 +0000

T: I don’t even know who’s who anymore, and I’m not going to try, they should all pick a unique handle, but whatevs.

By: T

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:35:51 +0000

I think that was self deprecation, Nick. You know, sort of a meta comment.

Tim: There are way too many Nick’s on the comment section currently.

By: Timothy

Timothy — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:01:25 +0000

You kids are just so cute together. Can I take a photo?

By: Nick

Nick — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:05:58 +0000

Since when have you been bothered by conflicts of interest, Evan? I recal a situation last year when you filed a grievance against Dallas Brown at the requets of Goward, who was not allowed to take sides during the election. Of course, you both denied this at the time, and all that the Emerald could publish was your inconsistencies in rhetoric, but Goward admitted after year’s end, that yes, he did advise you to file that grievance for him. Not like anybody doubted. A guy who didn’t know squat about student government suddenly is filing grievances based on “immoral” campaign practices, regulated by rules in the Green Tape Notebook. It was commonly known that Goward and Brown weren’t the best of friends since working together at DDS, where they fought for authority. But nooo, you shy away from conflicts of interst.

By: Evan

Evan — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:47:17 +0000

I would like to comment on “Since when is David Goward a moral authority?”’s post, but since that would be a clear conflict of interest, I choose instead to abstain.

By: Jacque

Jacque — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:09:11 +0000

hehehe… OHHHH SNAPS!