<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PFC Benchmark D.O.A.</title>
	<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/01/16/pfc-benchmark-doa/</link>
	<description>Free Minds, Free Markets, Free Booze</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doomscheissah</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/01/16/pfc-benchmark-doa/#comment-89319</link>
		<dc:creator>Doomscheissah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/01/16/pfc-benchmark-doa/#comment-89319</guid>
		<description>But Timothy, you didn't use the Federal RICO statutes. 

You simply used First Amendment. Look at Criminal prosecution, not civil prosecution. Because yes, OSPIRG (both of them) are committing felony racketeering. 

Anyone for a letter to Rudy Giuliani?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Timothy, you didn&#8217;t use the Federal RICO statutes. </p>
<p>You simply used First Amendment. Look at Criminal prosecution, not civil prosecution. Because yes, OSPIRG (both of them) are committing felony racketeering. </p>
<p>Anyone for a letter to Rudy Giuliani?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/01/16/pfc-benchmark-doa/#comment-89272</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/01/16/pfc-benchmark-doa/#comment-89272</guid>
		<description>We've tried that before, &lt;a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=search&#038;case=/data2/circs/9th/9735189.html&#038;friend=nytimes/" rel="nofollow"&gt;bloody&lt;/a&gt; 9th Circuit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve tried that before, <a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=search&#038;case=/data2/circs/9th/9735189.html&#038;friend=nytimes/" rel="nofollow">bloody</a> 9th Circuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doomscheissah</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/01/16/pfc-benchmark-doa/#comment-89257</link>
		<dc:creator>Doomscheissah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/01/16/pfc-benchmark-doa/#comment-89257</guid>
		<description>The first step for getting rid of waste is by cutting OSPIRG off completely.

And there is a way it can be done.

Anyone ever heard of the federal RICO Statutes? What OSPIRG is doing is a classic Racketeering operation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first step for getting rid of waste is by cutting OSPIRG off completely.</p>
<p>And there is a way it can be done.</p>
<p>Anyone ever heard of the federal RICO Statutes? What OSPIRG is doing is a classic Racketeering operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacque</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/01/16/pfc-benchmark-doa/#comment-89245</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/01/16/pfc-benchmark-doa/#comment-89245</guid>
		<description>right you are Ken!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>right you are Ken!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/01/16/pfc-benchmark-doa/#comment-89244</link>
		<dc:creator>daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/01/16/pfc-benchmark-doa/#comment-89244</guid>
		<description>tax and spend, tax and spend</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tax and spend, tax and spend</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacque</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/01/16/pfc-benchmark-doa/#comment-89231</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 01:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2007/01/16/pfc-benchmark-doa/#comment-89231</guid>
		<description>I think that it is easy to target the large departments and contracted services because they have the largest overheard. While I agree that there is fat to be cut in many many places, (for example I just recived a pretty little glossy pamphlet from the EMU-their annual report! it had lots of pretty pictures...I don't really care about all that...just the facts, you know?), there are so many areas that places like the Rec center can cut costs. I too hope that the Senate takes this benchmark seriously and encourage students to come forth with ideas, comments and questions about this issue since it is there money that is being spent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it is easy to target the large departments and contracted services because they have the largest overheard. While I agree that there is fat to be cut in many many places, (for example I just recived a pretty little glossy pamphlet from the EMU-their annual report! it had lots of pretty pictures&#8230;I don&#8217;t really care about all that&#8230;just the facts, you know?), there are so many areas that places like the Rec center can cut costs. I too hope that the Senate takes this benchmark seriously and encourage students to come forth with ideas, comments and questions about this issue since it is there money that is being spent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
