<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spellchecking Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/</link>
	<description>Free Minds, Free Markets, Free Booze</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doomscheissah</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-62456</link>
		<dc:creator>Doomscheissah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 06:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-62456</guid>
		<description>He'll be able to subvert the system better from there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;ll be able to subvert the system better from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-61555</link>
		<dc:creator>Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-61555</guid>
		<description>Um, the Con Court.... in other words, in total obscurity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, the Con Court&#8230;. in other words, in total obscurity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-61449</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-61449</guid>
		<description>as per the first comment, lets all make sure these kids are NOT the future of politics.  I would like to resist such bias and incompetence in future leaders as exhibited by many members of the current Senate... where is Wally Hicks when you need him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as per the first comment, lets all make sure these kids are NOT the future of politics.  I would like to resist such bias and incompetence in future leaders as exhibited by many members of the current Senate&#8230; where is Wally Hicks when you need him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60934</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60934</guid>
		<description>I just realized that I should've titled this "Spellchecking from the Bench"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just realized that I should&#8217;ve titled this &#8220;Spellchecking from the Bench&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60325</link>
		<dc:creator>Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60325</guid>
		<description>And they say it's hard to get humor across on blogs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And they say it&#8217;s hard to get humor across on blogs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60236</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60236</guid>
		<description>"[A]postrophe's"?  This is supposed to be meta, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[A]postrophe&#8217;s&#8221;?  This is supposed to be meta, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meghann</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60202</link>
		<dc:creator>Meghann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 07:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60202</guid>
		<description>Haha. This has gotta be one of the funniest ASUO stories ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha. This has gotta be one of the funniest ASUO stories ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60154</link>
		<dc:creator>Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 05:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60154</guid>
		<description>But Tyler's so yummy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Tyler&#8217;s so yummy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60101</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 00:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60101</guid>
		<description>Kids, don't make me turn this blog around.

We don't eat our own here, although we do sometimes fight amongst ourselves.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kids, don&#8217;t make me turn this blog around.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t eat our own here, although we do sometimes fight amongst ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60073</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 23:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60073</guid>
		<description>Jesus, who attacked whom here? Take the joke in the spirit in which it was intended, dude. And I've spilled far too many words for the OC (many shitty, many very good) to allow you to call me a sellout. 

Not that you're on notice or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus, who attacked whom here? Take the joke in the spirit in which it was intended, dude. And I&#8217;ve spilled far too many words for the OC (many shitty, many very good) to allow you to call me a sellout. </p>
<p>Not that you&#8217;re on notice or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60065</link>
		<dc:creator>Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 23:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60065</guid>
		<description>Yeah, you preach from your gilded cage Tyler... you'll always wish you were back at the Commentator, where apparently knowing how to properly use apostrophe's makes you hot shit. Sellout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, you preach from your gilded cage Tyler&#8230; you&#8217;ll always wish you were back at the Commentator, where apparently knowing how to properly use apostrophe&#8217;s makes you hot shit. Sellout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60059</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 23:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60059</guid>
		<description>You used an apostrophe correctly. Drink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You used an apostrophe correctly. Drink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niedermeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60047</link>
		<dc:creator>Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60047</guid>
		<description>"So poorly written as to be unintelligible"

Let me guess... has TGraf's never-ending search for greener pastures led him to writing ASUO rules? Do they pay more than $12.50 per writing assignment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So poorly written as to be unintelligible&#8221;</p>
<p>Let me guess&#8230; has TGraf&#8217;s never-ending search for greener pastures led him to writing ASUO rules? Do they pay more than $12.50 per writing assignment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60023</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 21:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/11/17/spellchecking-legislation/#comment-60023</guid>
		<description>These kids are the future of politics....enjoy.  At least they didn't blame the Court for not having enough intelligence to understand the infallible Senates proposed rule changes.  That would have been my answer...Scapegoating the accountant, that's just good politics, baby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These kids are the future of politics&#8230;.enjoy.  At least they didn&#8217;t blame the Court for not having enough intelligence to understand the infallible Senates proposed rule changes.  That would have been my answer&#8230;Scapegoating the accountant, that&#8217;s just good politics, baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
