<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ducks Defeat Sooners, Use Up 40 Years of Officiating Karma</title>
	<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/</link>
	<description>Free Minds, Free Markets, Free Booze</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: lunchstealer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41983</link>
		<dc:creator>lunchstealer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41983</guid>
		<description>No way man.  Dixie Chicks no good.

And yeah, USC isn't gonna have a good season.  When the smallest Div-IAA school (in football, there are smaller ones in hoops) got within one possession of winning, we can assume that Steve blew a frickin' gasket.  Wofford is actually my alma mater, so I laughed my ass off when I heard the final score. But I was a Gamecocks fan as a kid, and my dad went to Florida, so in Div-IA, I'm still pullin' for USC.

Oh, and to be fully on-topic, when I saw that onside kick, it was obvious, even after about 2 liters of beer (I was at an Octoberfest thing, so yeah, they measure their beer in liters, not pints) that Oregon touched it after about 8 yards.  Everybody around me must have been UT fans, though, because they were really happy to see the Sooners go down (or maybe they were just Ducks fans - who knows?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way man.  Dixie Chicks no good.</p>
<p>And yeah, USC isn&#8217;t gonna have a good season.  When the smallest Div-IAA school (in football, there are smaller ones in hoops) got within one possession of winning, we can assume that Steve blew a frickin&#8217; gasket.  Wofford is actually my alma mater, so I laughed my ass off when I heard the final score. But I was a Gamecocks fan as a kid, and my dad went to Florida, so in Div-IA, I&#8217;m still pullin&#8217; for USC.</p>
<p>Oh, and to be fully on-topic, when I saw that onside kick, it was obvious, even after about 2 liters of beer (I was at an Octoberfest thing, so yeah, they measure their beer in liters, not pints) that Oregon touched it after about 8 yards.  Everybody around me must have been UT fans, though, because they were really happy to see the Sooners go down (or maybe they were just Ducks fans - who knows?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41735</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41735</guid>
		<description>Yar, in honor o' &lt;a href="http://www.talklikeapirate.com/piratehome.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;international talk like a pirate day&lt;/a&gt;:

I be aye that your preferred collegiate american football team sucks a big pink one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yar, in honor o&#8217; <a href="http://www.talklikeapirate.com/piratehome.html" rel="nofollow">international talk like a pirate day</a>:</p>
<p>I be aye that your preferred collegiate american football team sucks a big pink one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impartial Hawkeye</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41723</link>
		<dc:creator>Impartial Hawkeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 02:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41723</guid>
		<description>Lunchstealer is obviously a Dixie Chicks fan, closet or otherwise.  He must be telling the truth about having lived in Texas though.  Us Yankees wouldn't have felt the need to seperate "Texas" from "South."  Rednecks are the same everywhere.  I hope that steak was midwestern, corn-fed beef, Stealer, or it wasn't nearly as mean as you think.

And a 'Cocks fan to boot?  Figures.  Spurrier AND the Dixie Chicks.

Incidentally, I accept full responsibility for initiating the political debate on this thread and offer my sincere apology, although it was fun while it lasted.  Tim may be surprised, but I agree with him that this forum and all related smack talking should be about football.  

So, Stealer, after getting by perennial powerhouse Wofford by a touchdown last week I can hardly wait to see how they fare at home this week against mighty Florida Atlantic....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lunchstealer is obviously a Dixie Chicks fan, closet or otherwise.  He must be telling the truth about having lived in Texas though.  Us Yankees wouldn&#8217;t have felt the need to seperate &#8220;Texas&#8221; from &#8220;South.&#8221;  Rednecks are the same everywhere.  I hope that steak was midwestern, corn-fed beef, Stealer, or it wasn&#8217;t nearly as mean as you think.</p>
<p>And a &#8216;Cocks fan to boot?  Figures.  Spurrier AND the Dixie Chicks.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I accept full responsibility for initiating the political debate on this thread and offer my sincere apology, although it was fun while it lasted.  Tim may be surprised, but I agree with him that this forum and all related smack talking should be about football.  </p>
<p>So, Stealer, after getting by perennial powerhouse Wofford by a touchdown last week I can hardly wait to see how they fare at home this week against mighty Florida Atlantic&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41690</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41690</guid>
		<description>Frankly, I'd rather talk about football.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I&#8217;d rather talk about football.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41669</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41669</guid>
		<description>I'm so sick of this debate.  Whether you agreed with it or not, the day America overthrew the government of Iraq we linked the futures of our two countries.  Our ineffective beauracracy has failed to rebuild Iraq, we never provided enough troops to maximize security, and we failed to increase Iraqi quality of life.  We have sacrificed thousands of lives and billions of dollars into a losing campaign and I'm personally pissed.   We don't need to "stay the course" and we don't need to "cut and run".  We need to win! Why isn't anybody talking about increasing troop levels and restoring Iraq's infrastructure.  If this is the question of our generation why are we half-assing it.    I voted for Bush in 04' because to me Kerry wasn't a viable option.  I probably throw my vote away in 08' because the Dems don't understand that they can't change the fact that we are there and the GOP wants to win on the cheap.  Neither choice is a winning choice and that makes me worry about my unborns future.  I wish I was smart enough to know the answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so sick of this debate.  Whether you agreed with it or not, the day America overthrew the government of Iraq we linked the futures of our two countries.  Our ineffective beauracracy has failed to rebuild Iraq, we never provided enough troops to maximize security, and we failed to increase Iraqi quality of life.  We have sacrificed thousands of lives and billions of dollars into a losing campaign and I&#8217;m personally pissed.   We don&#8217;t need to &#8220;stay the course&#8221; and we don&#8217;t need to &#8220;cut and run&#8221;.  We need to win! Why isn&#8217;t anybody talking about increasing troop levels and restoring Iraq&#8217;s infrastructure.  If this is the question of our generation why are we half-assing it.    I voted for Bush in 04&#8242; because to me Kerry wasn&#8217;t a viable option.  I probably throw my vote away in 08&#8242; because the Dems don&#8217;t understand that they can&#8217;t change the fact that we are there and the GOP wants to win on the cheap.  Neither choice is a winning choice and that makes me worry about my unborns future.  I wish I was smart enough to know the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lunchstealer</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41626</link>
		<dc:creator>lunchstealer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41626</guid>
		<description>Tim, I agree about amending the constitution.  If 9/11 changed everything this much, it should be a slam dunk to convince enough people to amend the constitution to give the executive the power he needs.  If not, then maybe terrorists aren't such a threat.

And just to answer some questions before we get started:
I've only lived in the South or Texas.
I cook a mean steak.
Toby Keith still sucks.

GO COCKS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, I agree about amending the constitution.  If 9/11 changed everything this much, it should be a slam dunk to convince enough people to amend the constitution to give the executive the power he needs.  If not, then maybe terrorists aren&#8217;t such a threat.</p>
<p>And just to answer some questions before we get started:<br />
I&#8217;ve only lived in the South or Texas.<br />
I cook a mean steak.<br />
Toby Keith still sucks.</p>
<p>GO COCKS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41596</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41596</guid>
		<description>Also, when you talk about modifying the Constitution do you mean by the legally acceptable process of a 2/3 vote of both houses of Congress and then ratification by 2/3 of the states or do you mean just ignoring it when it places inconvienient strictures on the Executive branch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, when you talk about modifying the Constitution do you mean by the legally acceptable process of a 2/3 vote of both houses of Congress and then ratification by 2/3 of the states or do you mean just ignoring it when it places inconvienient strictures on the Executive branch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41595</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41595</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;What percentage of the population was killed on December 7, 1941? It didn’t matter then, and it doesn’t matter now.&lt;/em&gt;

Except for the bit where the Japanese were allied with the Germans, who at the time were a leading industrial power and whose military capacity and technology outstripped that of the other nations of the world.  Whereas, frankly, The Terrorists are operating using out-dated Soviet technology that didn't work that well to begin with.  There's a difference of degree here, frankly.  Islamic Terrorists simply do not represent &lt;a href="http://www.reason.com/0610/fe.jw.the.shtml" rel="nofollow"&gt;the same sort of threat&lt;/a&gt; as the Axis or the Soviets.  

&lt;em&gt;That includes modifying the Constitution and/or the articles of the Geneva Convention.&lt;/em&gt;

You know, the Cold War didn't require that and I'm pretty sure a nuclear super power controlled by evil tyrants represents a greater threat than old Klashnikovs and dirty bombs.  The USSR actually, you know, had the capacity to drop a fair number of nukes into the US.  Sure, there was the mutually assured destruction angle, but anybody in the Middle East with nukes or capable of getting them (Iran, Pakistan, the Saudis, Syria) is also an evil tyrant with a pretty good hold on wanting to maintain power.

Ahmadinejad doesn't actually have any power within the Iranian regime, and the Ayatolla is more interested in maintaining power and gaining advantage than anything else (like all kleptocrats).  It's plainly obvious that Ahmadinejad is getting used as part of a brinkmanship strategy (think Kennedy/Cuba/McNamara) that, sadly, seems to be working.

Is continued terrorist violence a problem?  Yes, it presents a lot of difficulties, but it's both foolish and counterproductive to blow that threat out of proportion.  The actors with real power in the region do have an incentive for self-preservation, and know that if they were to, say, nuke Tel Aviv the entire region would be reduced to a boiling sea of glass.  They don't want that.  All of this aside from Isreal being a useful distraction from their own mistreatment of their citizenry, and no good to any of the regimes if destroyed, same with the west more generally.  If you destroy your scape goat, who do you blame when things don't get better?

But, seriously, just how much of the kool-aid did you drink?  Are they putting it in the water out there?  Should I only eat imported corn to avoid any residue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>What percentage of the population was killed on December 7, 1941? It didn’t matter then, and it doesn’t matter now.</em></p>
<p>Except for the bit where the Japanese were allied with the Germans, who at the time were a leading industrial power and whose military capacity and technology outstripped that of the other nations of the world.  Whereas, frankly, The Terrorists are operating using out-dated Soviet technology that didn&#8217;t work that well to begin with.  There&#8217;s a difference of degree here, frankly.  Islamic Terrorists simply do not represent <a href="http://www.reason.com/0610/fe.jw.the.shtml" rel="nofollow">the same sort of threat</a> as the Axis or the Soviets.  </p>
<p><em>That includes modifying the Constitution and/or the articles of the Geneva Convention.</em></p>
<p>You know, the Cold War didn&#8217;t require that and I&#8217;m pretty sure a nuclear super power controlled by evil tyrants represents a greater threat than old Klashnikovs and dirty bombs.  The USSR actually, you know, had the capacity to drop a fair number of nukes into the US.  Sure, there was the mutually assured destruction angle, but anybody in the Middle East with nukes or capable of getting them (Iran, Pakistan, the Saudis, Syria) is also an evil tyrant with a pretty good hold on wanting to maintain power.</p>
<p>Ahmadinejad doesn&#8217;t actually have any power within the Iranian regime, and the Ayatolla is more interested in maintaining power and gaining advantage than anything else (like all kleptocrats).  It&#8217;s plainly obvious that Ahmadinejad is getting used as part of a brinkmanship strategy (think Kennedy/Cuba/McNamara) that, sadly, seems to be working.</p>
<p>Is continued terrorist violence a problem?  Yes, it presents a lot of difficulties, but it&#8217;s both foolish and counterproductive to blow that threat out of proportion.  The actors with real power in the region do have an incentive for self-preservation, and know that if they were to, say, nuke Tel Aviv the entire region would be reduced to a boiling sea of glass.  They don&#8217;t want that.  All of this aside from Isreal being a useful distraction from their own mistreatment of their citizenry, and no good to any of the regimes if destroyed, same with the west more generally.  If you destroy your scape goat, who do you blame when things don&#8217;t get better?</p>
<p>But, seriously, just how much of the kool-aid did you drink?  Are they putting it in the water out there?  Should I only eat imported corn to avoid any residue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impartial Hawkeye</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41590</link>
		<dc:creator>Impartial Hawkeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41590</guid>
		<description>What percentage of the population was killed on December 7, 1941?  It didn't matter then, and it doesn't matter now.

Just as "the idea of who constitutes a person has expanded somewhat over the centuries," it is now time for US to expand OUR thoughts and adapt to what is happening around us.  That includes modifying the Constitution and/or the articles of the Geneva Convention.

The war on terrorism is unlike any war previously fought on the planet and calls for us to respond in ways unlike we've ever responded previously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What percentage of the population was killed on December 7, 1941?  It didn&#8217;t matter then, and it doesn&#8217;t matter now.</p>
<p>Just as &#8220;the idea of who constitutes a person has expanded somewhat over the centuries,&#8221; it is now time for US to expand OUR thoughts and adapt to what is happening around us.  That includes modifying the Constitution and/or the articles of the Geneva Convention.</p>
<p>The war on terrorism is unlike any war previously fought on the planet and calls for us to respond in ways unlike we&#8217;ve ever responded previously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41587</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41587</guid>
		<description>Now, if you want to talk about our ongoing overseas operations in Afghanistan and Iraq we'll probably have more in common.  The former, well, it's sort of hard to argue with taking out a government that directly sponsors terrorists and the latter, well, domino-theory-in-reverse seems reasonable....but I think both have been terribly mismanaged.

The former mainly because of our zeal for the drug war and insisting on erradicating opium poppies which provide about all the income in the country without doing anything to prop up the local economy.  The latter, well, it's kind of hard to install democracy anywhere and I don't think we've done a good job of dealing with local factors like three distinct groups that hate each other a lot.  Plus the issue of Syria sending in "insurgents" and what not.

But when it comes to things the government does inside the US?  We're a nation of laws, dammit, and it is completely unconcionable for the government to start wantonly violating its mandate in the name of "security".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, if you want to talk about our ongoing overseas operations in Afghanistan and Iraq we&#8217;ll probably have more in common.  The former, well, it&#8217;s sort of hard to argue with taking out a government that directly sponsors terrorists and the latter, well, domino-theory-in-reverse seems reasonable&#8230;.but I think both have been terribly mismanaged.</p>
<p>The former mainly because of our zeal for the drug war and insisting on erradicating opium poppies which provide about all the income in the country without doing anything to prop up the local economy.  The latter, well, it&#8217;s kind of hard to install democracy anywhere and I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ve done a good job of dealing with local factors like three distinct groups that hate each other a lot.  Plus the issue of Syria sending in &#8220;insurgents&#8221; and what not.</p>
<p>But when it comes to things the government does inside the US?  We&#8217;re a nation of laws, dammit, and it is completely unconcionable for the government to start wantonly violating its mandate in the name of &#8220;security&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41581</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41581</guid>
		<description>Well, being that there's a 3/5 clause in the Constitution, I certainly suffer no delusions about the opinions of the framers over racial matters.  Women couldn't vote either, for what it's worth.  "Person" meant "white, landowning male", but fortunately the idea of who consitutes a person has expanded somewhat over the centuries.  Do I think Padilla is as cuddly-wuddly as Pooh Bear?  No, but he is a citizen and he does have rights.  

But, I mean, the Constitution is TOTALLY about just ignoring it whenever a bunch of "camel jockeys", as you've so eloquently called them, kill .00106667% of the population.  I'm sure that was supposed to be in the articles somewhere, must've gotten covered up when Mason spilled the white-out, clumsy bastard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, being that there&#8217;s a 3/5 clause in the Constitution, I certainly suffer no delusions about the opinions of the framers over racial matters.  Women couldn&#8217;t vote either, for what it&#8217;s worth.  &#8220;Person&#8221; meant &#8220;white, landowning male&#8221;, but fortunately the idea of who consitutes a person has expanded somewhat over the centuries.  Do I think Padilla is as cuddly-wuddly as Pooh Bear?  No, but he is a citizen and he does have rights.  </p>
<p>But, I mean, the Constitution is TOTALLY about just ignoring it whenever a bunch of &#8220;camel jockeys&#8221;, as you&#8217;ve so eloquently called them, kill .00106667% of the population.  I&#8217;m sure that was supposed to be in the articles somewhere, must&#8217;ve gotten covered up when Mason spilled the white-out, clumsy bastard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impartial Hawkeye</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41574</link>
		<dc:creator>Impartial Hawkeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41574</guid>
		<description>Corpus schmorpus.  You think the same Congress would have sat idly by while camel jockeys disguised as airline pilots rammed into their buildings?  You think the same Congress would have defended the "rights" of those thugs?  Bunk.  

Our founding fathers have worn themselves out spinning in their graves thanks to the likes of the ACLU et al.  In their day a prison sentence was actually punishment and a deterrent from crime.  Hell, your buddy Padilla likely would have been shot first before being held without trial, and nobody would have complained a bit.

I just realized your last name must be Leary and you're obviously feeling the effects of the LSD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corpus schmorpus.  You think the same Congress would have sat idly by while camel jockeys disguised as airline pilots rammed into their buildings?  You think the same Congress would have defended the &#8220;rights&#8221; of those thugs?  Bunk.  </p>
<p>Our founding fathers have worn themselves out spinning in their graves thanks to the likes of the ACLU et al.  In their day a prison sentence was actually punishment and a deterrent from crime.  Hell, your buddy Padilla likely would have been shot first before being held without trial, and nobody would have complained a bit.</p>
<p>I just realized your last name must be Leary and you&#8217;re obviously feeling the effects of the LSD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41571</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41571</guid>
		<description>And, yes, as a matter of course, I &lt;em&gt;am&lt;/em&gt; aware that Jefferson attempted to suspend habeas corpus in order to get Aaron Burr for treason (by limiting the ablity of those accused of treason to file such writs).  You know the difference? &lt;strong&gt;Congress bloody stopped him&lt;/strong&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, yes, as a matter of course, I <em>am</em> aware that Jefferson attempted to suspend habeas corpus in order to get Aaron Burr for treason (by limiting the ablity of those accused of treason to file such writs).  You know the difference? <strong>Congress bloody stopped him</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41569</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41569</guid>
		<description>Buy? Why would I buy when it'll be on the net for free soon enough.  Wonders of the modern age, but I'm only interested if you're both over the legal age of consent.  And if your sister is hot.

&lt;em&gt;Not even our founding fathers could have foreseen the pure evil that spawned the crimes committed on 9/11/01 and continues still to plot similar actions. Same with the participants of the Geneva Convention. Thank God we have an administration willing to do what’s right to protect the masses, even if those being protected are as ungrateful as you&lt;/em&gt;

English Translation: 9/11 changed everything. You ought to be grateful that we have an Executive so willing to violate the principles upon which the country was founded in order to, at best, minimally reduce the already &lt;a href="http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/09/11/john-mueller/are-we-safer/" rel="nofollow"&gt;miniscule&lt;/a&gt; probability that some of its citizens are killed by terrorists.  If you question the methods or complain about the violations you're an ingrate, a terrorist sympathizer, or a dupe.  Get in line and remember that we have always been at war with Eurasia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy? Why would I buy when it&#8217;ll be on the net for free soon enough.  Wonders of the modern age, but I&#8217;m only interested if you&#8217;re both over the legal age of consent.  And if your sister is hot.</p>
<p><em>Not even our founding fathers could have foreseen the pure evil that spawned the crimes committed on 9/11/01 and continues still to plot similar actions. Same with the participants of the Geneva Convention. Thank God we have an administration willing to do what’s right to protect the masses, even if those being protected are as ungrateful as you</em></p>
<p>English Translation: 9/11 changed everything. You ought to be grateful that we have an Executive so willing to violate the principles upon which the country was founded in order to, at best, minimally reduce the already <a href="http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/09/11/john-mueller/are-we-safer/" rel="nofollow">miniscule</a> probability that some of its citizens are killed by terrorists.  If you question the methods or complain about the violations you&#8217;re an ingrate, a terrorist sympathizer, or a dupe.  Get in line and remember that we have always been at war with Eurasia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impartial Hawkeye</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41566</link>
		<dc:creator>Impartial Hawkeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41566</guid>
		<description>Whew!  Sis was a real firecracker today.  Hey Tim, since you're such a staunch defender of pornography, ya wanna buy a copy of the video of me and her?

Not even our founding fathers could have foreseen the pure evil that spawned the crimes committed on 9/11/01 and continues still to plot similar actions.  Same with the participants of the Geneva Convention.  Thank God we have an administration willing to do what's right to protect the masses, even if those being protected are as ungrateful as you.

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO  HAWKS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew!  Sis was a real firecracker today.  Hey Tim, since you&#8217;re such a staunch defender of pornography, ya wanna buy a copy of the video of me and her?</p>
<p>Not even our founding fathers could have foreseen the pure evil that spawned the crimes committed on 9/11/01 and continues still to plot similar actions.  Same with the participants of the Geneva Convention.  Thank God we have an administration willing to do what&#8217;s right to protect the masses, even if those being protected are as ungrateful as you.</p>
<p>GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO  HAWKS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41561</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41561</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt; No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, &lt;strong&gt;except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger&lt;/strong&gt;; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.&lt;/em&gt;

That applies to military personnel or persons in the Militia who are in active service during a time of War or public danger, the framers seem to have neglected the "except civilians the Executive branch really doesn't like" clause that Madison was always going on about.

I knew there was a reason I always liked Trapper John better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, <strong>except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger</strong>; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.</em></p>
<p>That applies to military personnel or persons in the Militia who are in active service during a time of War or public danger, the framers seem to have neglected the &#8220;except civilians the Executive branch really doesn&#8217;t like&#8221; clause that Madison was always going on about.</p>
<p>I knew there was a reason I always liked Trapper John better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impartial Hawkeye</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41545</link>
		<dc:creator>Impartial Hawkeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41545</guid>
		<description>May President Tom's first missile land on your house.  Oh, and did you happen to notice the "War or public danger" language in the 5th amendment?  I'd write more but I have to go make love with my sister.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May President Tom&#8217;s first missile land on your house.  Oh, and did you happen to notice the &#8220;War or public danger&#8221; language in the 5th amendment?  I&#8217;d write more but I have to go make love with my sister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41535</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41535</guid>
		<description>Keep the country safe and free by declaring war on pornography, violating our fourth and fifth amendment rights on a regular basis, and making sure that US Citizens &lt;a href="http://www.chargepadilla.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;don't see trial&lt;/a&gt;?  Or are you thinking of freedom in the "do what the government says and live in fear, dear citizens" sense?

Please, if you think a few thousand brown people living in caves presents some sort of existential threat to the West on the order of Soviet Russia or The Axis, well, you're either intellectually dishonest or an idiot.  But, you know, this thread is about football so getting into the whole "You're a jingoistic moron/no, you're a Terrorist-lover" argument is roughly akin to the worst aspects of a high school CX-Policy debate.

In Conclusion:
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO DUCKS!

PS: Country music is for inbreds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep the country safe and free by declaring war on pornography, violating our fourth and fifth amendment rights on a regular basis, and making sure that US Citizens <a href="http://www.chargepadilla.org/" rel="nofollow">don&#8217;t see trial</a>?  Or are you thinking of freedom in the &#8220;do what the government says and live in fear, dear citizens&#8221; sense?</p>
<p>Please, if you think a few thousand brown people living in caves presents some sort of existential threat to the West on the order of Soviet Russia or The Axis, well, you&#8217;re either intellectually dishonest or an idiot.  But, you know, this thread is about football so getting into the whole &#8220;You&#8217;re a jingoistic moron/no, you&#8217;re a Terrorist-lover&#8221; argument is roughly akin to the worst aspects of a high school CX-Policy debate.</p>
<p>In Conclusion:<br />
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO DUCKS!</p>
<p>PS: Country music is for inbreds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impartial Hawkeye</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41521</link>
		<dc:creator>Impartial Hawkeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41521</guid>
		<description>Niedermeyer, my friend, I'll be the first to admit my home state is rather boring.  Not much other than cornfields, beanfields and some of the best livestock in the world.  But you're probably a tofu and seaweed kinda guy so you wouldn't appreciate a great steak or 1"+ thick pork chop.

Boring, yes, but full of some of the most genuine people you'll ever encounter.  People grounded in what's real, and who enjoy entertainers of the same ilk, like Toby Keith.  Because the air here so frequently smells of manure it's very easy for us to identify a B.S.'er when we see/hear one, and I smell one here.

By the way, "the defining struggle of the 21st century" in these parts is the war against Islamo-Facism.  You go fight your douchebags.  God knows there are plenty of them in your neck of the woods.  Meantime, us real folk will do whatever we can to keep the country safe and free so you and your kind can continue to express your opinions in forums like this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Niedermeyer, my friend, I&#8217;ll be the first to admit my home state is rather boring.  Not much other than cornfields, beanfields and some of the best livestock in the world.  But you&#8217;re probably a tofu and seaweed kinda guy so you wouldn&#8217;t appreciate a great steak or 1&#8243;+ thick pork chop.</p>
<p>Boring, yes, but full of some of the most genuine people you&#8217;ll ever encounter.  People grounded in what&#8217;s real, and who enjoy entertainers of the same ilk, like Toby Keith.  Because the air here so frequently smells of manure it&#8217;s very easy for us to identify a B.S.&#8217;er when we see/hear one, and I smell one here.</p>
<p>By the way, &#8220;the defining struggle of the 21st century&#8221; in these parts is the war against Islamo-Facism.  You go fight your douchebags.  God knows there are plenty of them in your neck of the woods.  Meantime, us real folk will do whatever we can to keep the country safe and free so you and your kind can continue to express your opinions in forums like this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41464</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/09/16/ducks-defeat-sooners-use-up-40-years-of-officiating-karma/#comment-41464</guid>
		<description>OSU Fan: Texas would be great except for the damn weather.  Low taxes, friendly people, good food...all delivered at 100+ degrees nine months of the year.  And, I must confess, I don't actually watch college football (so I did not see the Tulsa/North Texas game), but I sort of enjoy the back-and-forth taunting that goes along with it.  Nothing like a good taunting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OSU Fan: Texas would be great except for the damn weather.  Low taxes, friendly people, good food&#8230;all delivered at 100+ degrees nine months of the year.  And, I must confess, I don&#8217;t actually watch college football (so I did not see the Tulsa/North Texas game), but I sort of enjoy the back-and-forth taunting that goes along with it.  Nothing like a good taunting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
