Is it not possible that these columns were destroyed by bombs? … Isn’t it just too much of a coincidence that the crash happened at this very spot with these “blast resistant” windows? … Couldn’t those marks from a plane wing (if he really did see them) be caused by a different aircraft? … If he was able to pick up plane parts by hand, then couldn’t these parts have been planted by hand? … And that photo is consistent with a fiery missile attack or other type of plane crash!

This is not a refutation of anything in the Popular Mechanics piece. It’s a bunch of speculative nonsense, substantiated by links to even more speculative nonsense. On this basis, you might as well believe that aliens crashed flying saucers into the World Trade Center, or creatures from Atlantis fired RPGs at the Pentagon, or that 9/11 never happened at all and we’re really undergoing a mass hallucination brought about by the CIA putting dope in the reservoirs.

I expect personal apologies from all of you at some point down the line. The truth is coming out and it’s only a matter of time before you guys realize it.

Don’t hold your breath, ace.

I think there are some questions in regards to the 9/11 attacks that could be more carefully examined through rational public discourse; however, it’s not like your condescending attitude is making me any more motivated to look into it.

Tim,

I’m sad to say I won’t be in town for your visit as I’ll be heading back to Portland on Friday in preparation for my trip overseas. I’ll remember to raise a glass in your honor in London.

Man the shit is way deeper than I ever thought….

These “theories” are only far reaching because people purporting to be intelligent and aware dismiss and blackball them before they even look into them.

You know that scary feeling you get in your stomach and chest when you find out about something you don’t know? Yea, that’s what you should be getting right about now.

Why rehash a national tragedy when there are so many issues on which to build some consensus in the here-and-now. I think that the issue is so divisive, and the theory you are trying to prove is so far reaching that there is little good that can come out of printing it in the magazine.

–Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator.

“Oregon Commentator publishes evidence of 9/11 cover-up”

Editor1: wait..who the fuck is the OC?
Editor2: Uhm, a student news paper from the UofO that looked at some websites and critically examined the ‘evidence.’
Editor1:”Git that corn outa my faaace!” (nacho libre..)

I’m so glad you pulled out that ridiculous (and obvious propaganda) from Popular Mechanics. It was authored by Benjamin Chertoff. I hope that sounds familiar. His cousin Michael is head of the Department of Homeland Security. Man, you guys should do your fucking homework.

Speaking of homework, when you say “obvious propaganda,” I assume that means that you can refute all - or some, or any - of the assertions it makes.

9/11 was an inside job, everyone knows it, you guys are behind…

Excuse me, but are you trying to use peer pressure to convince people of the veracity of your absurd conspiracy theories? Do you find this often works?

I’ll make things easy for you stubborn guys.

http://www.universalseed.org
http://www.supportthetruth.com
http://www.loosechange911.com

WTF does a “real strategy” for impeaching Bush have anything to do with the UofO?? I assume you’ve read our magazine so you cannot dismiss the fact that we do run stories that can have a big impact on campus.

There is no reasonable proof that the towers we brought down by demolition, the war on terror is no more illegal than the IRS, Bush won both elections fair and square according to our system.

Everyone seems so intent on focusing on the symptoms of the disease that is killing America.

I do agree with you that we’ve been brainwashed - into believing that government does more good than harm.

The only thing Americans are stupid about is that they give up liberties for false security.