<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There Oughta Be A Law &#8230; Oh, Wait &#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/</link>
	<description>Free Minds, Free Markets, Free Booze</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oregon Commentator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When Voting Legally, Senate Chooses Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15478</link>
		<dc:creator>Oregon Commentator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When Voting Legally, Senate Chooses Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 06:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15478</guid>
		<description>[...] In a stunner, Senate today changed its mind and elected Sara Hamilton as Senate President for the Summer. In an illegal, secret vote on Wednesday the Senate had purportedly elected Athan Papailiou. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In a stunner, Senate today changed its mind and elected Sara Hamilton as Senate President for the Summer. In an illegal, secret vote on Wednesday the Senate had purportedly elected Athan Papailiou. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15363</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 08:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15363</guid>
		<description>Senate &lt;em&gt;has&lt;/em&gt; to do it since they haven't technically elected a President or Vice-President for summer. The secret election was about as legitimate as Milli Vanilli.

Also, the meeting minutes for 5/24 and 5/31 still aren't available online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate <em>has</em> to do it since they haven&#8217;t technically elected a President or Vice-President for summer. The secret election was about as legitimate as Milli Vanilli.</p>
<p>Also, the meeting minutes for 5/24 and 5/31 still aren&#8217;t available online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg S.</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15362</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 07:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15362</guid>
		<description>I cant believe Im saying this, but Senate is actually doing the correct thing by holding another meeting to re-elect chairs.  Even though it seems like it was Stephanie Erickson's fault in the first place, the new senate is redoing it all anyway.  Or maybe they just didnt want to get sued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant believe Im saying this, but Senate is actually doing the correct thing by holding another meeting to re-elect chairs.  Even though it seems like it was Stephanie Erickson&#8217;s fault in the first place, the new senate is redoing it all anyway.  Or maybe they just didnt want to get sued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Rost</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15337</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Rost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 03:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15337</guid>
		<description>Bill Bradbury's office? 

Screw it. They do nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Bradbury&#8217;s office? </p>
<p>Screw it. They do nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael G.</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15319</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 01:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15319</guid>
		<description>Not only that, but it's the Secretary of State's office that investigates violations of Public Meetings law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only that, but it&#8217;s the Secretary of State&#8217;s office that investigates violations of Public Meetings law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15316</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 01:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15316</guid>
		<description>Yes, Miles, that may be true,  but as Greg stated, all they have to do is have the meeting again and this time adhere to the rules. And, yes, it appears as if they are going to do this. 

I would, however, love to file a grievance insisting that Erickson apologize to the Students of Faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Miles, that may be true,  but as Greg stated, all they have to do is have the meeting again and this time adhere to the rules. And, yes, it appears as if they are going to do this. </p>
<p>I would, however, love to file a grievance insisting that Erickson apologize to the Students of Faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Rost</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15313</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Rost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15313</guid>
		<description>Wouldn't be much gas. One of my good friends from the Law School is working in the AG's office right now. *grin*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t be much gas. One of my good friends from the Law School is working in the AG&#8217;s office right now. *grin*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg S.</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15312</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15312</guid>
		<description>"192.680 Enforcement of ORS 192.610 to 192.690; effect of violation on validity of decision of governing body; liability of members. (1) A decision made by a governing body of a public body in violation of ORS 192.610 to 192.690 shall be voidable. The decision shall not be voided if the governing body of the public body reinstates the decision while in compliance with ORS 192.610 to 192.690. A decision that is reinstated is effective from the date of its initial adoption."
 - I would assume that the "governing body" in this case would be the ASUO Constitution Court (correct me if I;m wrong).  Thus, someone (and I assume it is going to be Tyler) would need to file a grievance which would go to the ASUO Constitution Court, which would then declare the vote invalid, and make the ASUO Senate re-elect summer committee chairs.  But it looks like they are doing this (by the above post) anyway.  Miles, I would save your time and gas - I dont know that the Attorney General's office would really care about a violation of this scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;192.680 Enforcement of ORS 192.610 to 192.690; effect of violation on validity of decision of governing body; liability of members. (1) A decision made by a governing body of a public body in violation of ORS 192.610 to 192.690 shall be voidable. The decision shall not be voided if the governing body of the public body reinstates the decision while in compliance with ORS 192.610 to 192.690. A decision that is reinstated is effective from the date of its initial adoption.&#8221;<br />
 - I would assume that the &#8220;governing body&#8221; in this case would be the ASUO Constitution Court (correct me if I;m wrong).  Thus, someone (and I assume it is going to be Tyler) would need to file a grievance which would go to the ASUO Constitution Court, which would then declare the vote invalid, and make the ASUO Senate re-elect summer committee chairs.  But it looks like they are doing this (by the above post) anyway.  Miles, I would save your time and gas - I dont know that the Attorney General&#8217;s office would really care about a violation of this scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Rost</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15303</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Rost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 22:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15303</guid>
		<description>I think I will go down and file a grievance, and maybe contact someone from the Atty. General's office.

I could make it real hell for Stephanie Erickson. To which, it would be payback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I will go down and file a grievance, and maybe contact someone from the Atty. General&#8217;s office.</p>
<p>I could make it real hell for Stephanie Erickson. To which, it would be payback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15301</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 22:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15301</guid>
		<description>Where's a walkout when you need one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s a walkout when you need one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15294</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 20:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15294</guid>
		<description>Are you personal friends with any of these people, Todd? Because that's what it takes. I mean, Nate Gulley? Seriously? Wally Hicks? Jacob Daniels? I just don't get it. 

And we should file the grievance tomorrow. We're not trying to be jerks about this, but I think it's rather important to notify these people when they violate state law/federal law. Especially when they act like dicks when they're doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you personal friends with any of these people, Todd? Because that&#8217;s what it takes. I mean, Nate Gulley? Seriously? Wally Hicks? Jacob Daniels? I just don&#8217;t get it. </p>
<p>And we should file the grievance tomorrow. We&#8217;re not trying to be jerks about this, but I think it&#8217;s rather important to notify these people when they violate state law/federal law. Especially when they act like dicks when they&#8217;re doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15287</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 19:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15287</guid>
		<description>They weeded out me!  The system must work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They weeded out me!  The system must work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15273</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 18:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15273</guid>
		<description>Hey Ian, they really just don't want to make anyone mad... and we know all of these people are highly qualified for these positions, why should we really question anyone being elected into positions of Senate leadership or vacant seats?  Seriously, don't you have FULL confidence in the committee (Ashley Rees, Mike Fillipelli, Sara Hamilton, and Athan Papailiou) that hired for the vacant senate seats.  I mean, don't you? Plus if the Senate leadership is being elected by the slate, I mean the senate, those senators will be critical enough to weed out the unqualified candidates....(if you didn't catch on to the sarcasm, insert here).

Kudos for filing a greivance by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ian, they really just don&#8217;t want to make anyone mad&#8230; and we know all of these people are highly qualified for these positions, why should we really question anyone being elected into positions of Senate leadership or vacant seats?  Seriously, don&#8217;t you have FULL confidence in the committee (Ashley Rees, Mike Fillipelli, Sara Hamilton, and Athan Papailiou) that hired for the vacant senate seats.  I mean, don&#8217;t you? Plus if the Senate leadership is being elected by the slate, I mean the senate, those senators will be critical enough to weed out the unqualified candidates&#8230;.(if you didn&#8217;t catch on to the sarcasm, insert here).</p>
<p>Kudos for filing a greivance by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meghann</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15264</link>
		<dc:creator>Meghann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 17:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15264</guid>
		<description>I don't think anything about this situation was "vicious" or "bitter." It sounds like the Senate is just stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anything about this situation was &#8220;vicious&#8221; or &#8220;bitter.&#8221; It sounds like the Senate is just stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15258</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15258</guid>
		<description>"Academic politics is the most vicious and bitter form of politics,
because the stakes are so low." (Wallace Sayre)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Academic politics is the most vicious and bitter form of politics,<br />
because the stakes are so low.&#8221; (Wallace Sayre)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15206</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 07:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15206</guid>
		<description>I cleaned up some of the code a bit. Tyler had to rush in order to get it up onto the web before we were kicked out of the EMU.

&lt;em&gt;Did I really say “balloting”? You sure it wasn’t “outcome” or something more intelligent?&lt;/em&gt;

You said "balloting."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cleaned up some of the code a bit. Tyler had to rush in order to get it up onto the web before we were kicked out of the EMU.</p>
<p><em>Did I really say “balloting”? You sure it wasn’t “outcome” or something more intelligent?</em></p>
<p>You said &#8220;balloting.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Rost</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15205</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Rost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 07:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15205</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm...first case for one of my friends, potentially?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm&#8230;first case for one of my friends, potentially?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meghann</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15201</link>
		<dc:creator>Meghann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 06:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15201</guid>
		<description>They'll probably try to cite FERPA, the student privacy law, which would be total bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ll probably try to cite FERPA, the student privacy law, which would be total bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15197</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 06:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15197</guid>
		<description>Did I really say "balloting"?  You sure it wasn't "outcome" or something more intelligent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I really say &#8220;balloting&#8221;?  You sure it wasn&#8217;t &#8220;outcome&#8221; or something more intelligent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt P.</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15196</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 06:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2006/06/07/there-oughta-be-a-law-oh-wait/#comment-15196</guid>
		<description>But, Mr. Graf, if they are required to release the Senate's votes, it might hurt some people's feelings! Is that what you want? To hurt people's feelings?

I have respect for the Student Senate (and the Bus Project, just as an aside...), but the law's the law and it's best we all follow it. Good post, sir. Thanks for the update!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, Mr. Graf, if they are required to release the Senate&#8217;s votes, it might hurt some people&#8217;s feelings! Is that what you want? To hurt people&#8217;s feelings?</p>
<p>I have respect for the Student Senate (and the Bus Project, just as an aside&#8230;), but the law&#8217;s the law and it&#8217;s best we all follow it. Good post, sir. Thanks for the update!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
