Oh, yeah… and jokes were made. Oppressive jokes.

Is this what they mean by “taking the fight to them”?

My impression is that most reasonable people don’t even care that much what they have to say, and a few nut jobs were pissed off by it, but it doesn’t seem like anyone out there is being literally bound in chains and or forced away from the election polls by the Insurgent’s madness. I refuse to believe the Insurgent has the sheer power necessary to either end oppression or commit it.

You want to end oppression but you oppress another group?

You want the government to intervene to further your beliefs, silence our free speech, and attack the Lord Jesus, whom from all accounts ever written, preached only peace - and you call yourself an Anarchist?

You’re a loser pira. I hope you fall on a hot burner.

Besides that point, To end oppression by violating another organization’s civil right to free speech and expression via the route that was taken…that’s still defunding, plain and simple.

1. I said this so many times last year I thought it would sink in, but once again: I don’t really care about defunding the Commentator. Even if it were possible, I’m sure you could come up with some way of printing it anyway. I am interested in ending oppression (I’m not getting into a strategy description here because it would take too long), and
2. if I sometimes use tactics that you don’t consider “anarchist” enough - well, self-proclaimed dictators of anarchism who do not identify as anarchist themselves just aren’t the most credible sources of information on what is anarchist and what is not. And speaking of anarchism,
3. what’s with calling me a pinko? Isn’t that a reference to communism? I mean, that’s the wrong political affiliation and it’s boring. Anarcho-nutball, now that was a derogatory term I could use - it referenced my politics and my affiliation with freedom and justice in mental health. I wish you more clarity and creativity next time.

P.S. Well spoken, Timothy!

Because my DayPlanner was just taking such a beating from those nasty holidays.

Tim-
Awesome post. I’m so glad that she wrote that in because it reveals how patently juvenile and ignorant their point-of-view is. And of course it says FORMER contributer…

This is the best part:
“The Insurgent attacked Christianity without singling out individual Christians or instigating violence. Christian ideologies dictate our calendars, are taken seriously as potential replacements for science in schools and infuse politics and culture.”

So instead of voicing logical arguments against what they believe to be a “Christian Hegemony,” they lash out in the most immature and non-nonsensical way possible! Does anyone even have the faintest idea that the collective was pissed off about the “Hegemony” when they saw those drawings? How do they in anyway convey a message other than intolerance, ignorance, and hate - supposedly the very same attitudes they want to eliminate???

If the collective reads this - all I can say is that you all are gutless, mindless, and pathetic.

Your continious hypocrisy is infinite.