Comments on: Electronic Insurgent

By: Niedermeyer

Niedermeyer — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:46:34 +0000

“We could even have productive intercourse about organized religion. What do you say?”

I swear I overheard that one at Taylors once…

By: Bryan

Bryan — Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:40:01 +0000

Will somebody please think about the children? (WERTYILKJHGFDS)

By: Don E

Don E — Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:27:45 +0000

I respect the right of free speech that our fathers had the foresight to guarantee us in our constitution. To that end, I also respect the right of those who administer the Commentator. What I think has happened here is that you are no longer being true to the intention of the paper or any public forum–to promote the exchange of ideas, perhaps leading to the enhancement of human relations. Instead you are creating a mockery of free speech.

I read most of what was in here, and I couldn’t help but feel sorry, not only for the lack of productive exchange, but for the mean-spirited comments (I try not to judge the individual himself). Let’s not be hurtful, but have respect for one another. What will we remember as our biggest contribution to mankind? Does anyone think that they are here on earth just to take up space, then die (LIABATYDSFI)? Let’s start with our opinions on the war; let’s have an open discussion about the pros and cons of legalizing marijuana. How about gaming tips or favorite hunting spots? We could even have productive intercourse about organized religion. What do you say?

By: Sharon

Sharon — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:44:59 +0000

From what I understand, this paper is supported by the University, financially and otherwise.

Oregon just lost the support of another alumus.

By: Farmer

Farmer — Mon, 29 May 2006 22:39:14 +0000

fair enough i will move on.

By: Timothy

Timothy — Mon, 29 May 2006 21:47:24 +0000

Frankly, the one true religion is Flying Spagetti Monsterism. I have been touched by his noodly appendage, and that is the only path to salvation.

By: Library

Library — Mon, 29 May 2006 19:57:59 +0000

I think what Miles means is more along the lines of “A Theological discussion? On a satire journal’s website? Can we just not go there”.

By: Farmer

Farmer — Mon, 29 May 2006 17:08:09 +0000

Miles, theological discussions is not something to be afraid of. 85 % of the American population believes there is a God. If most of us believe in that truth then most of us should be willing to discuss it. It is my understanding that the stain you have was not caused by theology, but the good news is it can be removed by it.

Isaiah 1:18
18 “Come now, let us reason together,”
says the LORD.
“Though your sins are like scarlet,
they shall be as white as snow;
though they are red as crimson,
they shall be like wool.

By: Miles Rost

Miles Rost — Sun, 28 May 2006 04:06:51 +0000

Whoa…I think I stepped into a theological discussion.

Anyone got stain remover?

By: Farmer

Farmer — Sun, 28 May 2006 01:14:13 +0000

It would have been nice if Judas changed his and wrote a gospel, but it contradicts earlier scripture. Instead we see he betrayed Jesus to the high priests for 30 pieces of silver and went and hung himself.
Read how Judas died in Matthew 27 and Paul agrees about his death in Acts 1:18-19. They both talked of it as if it were common knowledge. Scripture authenticates itself by prophecy you can read Zechariah 11:12-13.
Just like the high priests that paid for the betrayal of Christ. Societies have been trying to destroy Christianity since its inception. The fact that false gospels were written is no surprise. The fact that they were so quickly embraced by those who despise Christianity is not a shock either.