Comments on: Election Watch: Unbecoming Conduct Code Conference? Edition

By: Silly Rabbit

Silly Rabbit — Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:40:07 +0000

Yes, it is Nate Gulley.

By: Amy

Amy — Mon, 27 Mar 2006 02:40:38 +0000

So, after reading some of the comments “Nate” has made, I am going to hope that “Nate” is not Nate Gulley. I met him onve and I really hope this isn’t his attitude for the campaign.

By: Amy

Amy — Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:02:00 +0000

I believe Nate is “Nate Gulley” of the slate. If he’s not, then I stand corrected.

By: Olly

Olly — Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:16:23 +0000

I don’t know who Nate is, but that’s certainly a novel way of campaigning.

By: Ian

Ian — Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:53:31 +0000

Ahahahahahaha

By: Meghann

Meghann — Sat, 25 Mar 2006 01:10:41 +0000

um, hahaha?

Who is this “Nate” character?

By: Nate

Nate — Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:16:57 +0000

CRITTNER!

By: Meghann

Meghann — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:37:07 +0000

Screw facts; it’s time for Vishanoff.

Connect the dots. Vote Vishanoff.

Join the Facebook group now. Tell your friends.

By: Olly

Olly — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:31:24 +0000

Bah. C’mon, Tim, it’s election season! It’s time for FACTS!

By: Miles Rost

Miles Rost — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:50:50 +0000

Ferget that. Just have a beer.

By: Timothy

Timothy — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:07:42 +0000

One day I too will learn to read.

By: Miles Rost

Miles Rost — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:36:58 +0000

Nick? I thought it was Nate that said that.

By: Timothy

Timothy — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:45:28 +0000

~~Nick~~ Nate: When you pay the hosting and domain registration charges for the Oregon Commentator website, feel free to post whatever you wish. As, currently, I am the person who pays for same, I feel pretty good about dictating the rules of behavior. Same as if you ever had cause to enter my abode, or my car. Except on the blog I won’t make you wear a tutu and tell me I look pretty.

By: Olly

Olly — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:57:37 +0000

For what it’s worth, I say bring on the manifestos and the propaganda and the attack ads and whatnot. This stuff is fun.

However, JARED, JULIANA, and their FACTS are all going to have to do a lot more than that to overcome the one… the only… ladies and gentlemen, Zach Vishanoff as write-in candidate. Remember: Suite 4 is much smaller than Moss Street, and will be commensurately easier to defend.

By: Silly Rabbit

Silly Rabbit — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:31:54 +0000

Oh. My. God.

Kool-aid drinker at 4 o’clock…

Nate, do you not know the first rule of private property? It means if you don’t follow the rules, you can get your IP Banned.

By: Nate

Nate — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 07:32:56 +0000

I thought that this Blog and the Commentator were places for opinions, comments, and anything remotely related to the U of O. My comments were not spam, they are the FACTS about this election! I’m sorry if I offended the other canadates who cant match Jared and Juliana.

Peace

By: Miles Rost

Miles Rost — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 03:47:25 +0000

Hell, you won’t see me advertise a candidate on here.

By: Jared

Jared — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:01:06 +0000

Thanks for the support guys, but lets not get in the way of the more interesting blogging by Nick and Goward.

By: HardCorps

HardCorps — Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:05:51 +0000

Uhh, that’s my platform..

By: Timothy

Timothy — Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:46:50 +0000

Stop spamming up my website with your propaganda, dipshits.

I’ll let it go this time, but beware of my administrative abilities.

You have been warned.