<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;It May Seem Ridiculous To Talk About Mexican Terrorists - But&#8230;&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/</link>
	<description>Free Minds, Free Markets, Free Booze</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gabrielle</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabrielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 05:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2112</guid>
		<description>Because I can't let this go......

I talked to my father about this subject. He brought up a good point. He is recently retired from the construction business in central Oregon. He has seen an influx of immigrant workers, primarily working illegally (i.e. no taxes), in the construction business. His feeling was that they were keeping wages unreasonably low because they were willing to work for less and not be covered by the usual SAFE  and social security, etc. Not all jobs taken by immigrants are undesirable to the established population. Construction jobs are considered some of the best if you are willing to take the physical abuse of heavy labor and many are. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because I can&#8217;t let this go&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>I talked to my father about this subject. He brought up a good point. He is recently retired from the construction business in central Oregon. He has seen an influx of immigrant workers, primarily working illegally (i.e. no taxes), in the construction business. His feeling was that they were keeping wages unreasonably low because they were willing to work for less and not be covered by the usual SAFE  and social security, etc. Not all jobs taken by immigrants are undesirable to the established population. Construction jobs are considered some of the best if you are willing to take the physical abuse of heavy labor and many are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy D</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2111</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2111</guid>
		<description>75 mins is only 80mph.. 
I like going fast, luckily we have a lot of unoccupied highway in the US. It does take more gas for me to drive 80 vs 65, but then i get there like 20mins faster..

When I graduate, the 350z will have a little test drive through albany..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>75 mins is only 80mph..<br />
I like going fast, luckily we have a lot of unoccupied highway in the US. It does take more gas for me to drive 80 vs 65, but then i get there like 20mins faster..</p>
<p>When I graduate, the 350z will have a little test drive through albany..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danimal</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator>Danimal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 06:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2110</guid>
		<description>Andy:  I was coming from Manning, 28 miles northwest of Portland, and not violating the speed limit the entire time.  83 minutes is not the full duration.  However, even my personal best Portland-Eugene comes nowhere near your 75 minutes.  I am impressed.  Although, if German rules governed I-5, I'm confident I could trim that to 70 in the right car.

AJB:  Why would I cry after getting a speeding ticket?  I generally just get mad and drive faster, and renew my personal commitment to a more sensible speed policy.  It's been slow in coming but I like where the country is headed on highway speed.  Meanwhile, I'll do what I have to do to get where I need to go as fast as possible while minimizing my getting caught.  Just like illegal immigrants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy:  I was coming from Manning, 28 miles northwest of Portland, and not violating the speed limit the entire time.  83 minutes is not the full duration.  However, even my personal best Portland-Eugene comes nowhere near your 75 minutes.  I am impressed.  Although, if German rules governed I-5, I&#8217;m confident I could trim that to 70 in the right car.</p>
<p>AJB:  Why would I cry after getting a speeding ticket?  I generally just get mad and drive faster, and renew my personal commitment to a more sensible speed policy.  It&#8217;s been slow in coming but I like where the country is headed on highway speed.  Meanwhile, I&#8217;ll do what I have to do to get where I need to go as fast as possible while minimizing my getting caught.  Just like illegal immigrants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy D</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2109</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2109</guid>
		<description>Ha! I can do it in 75mins. They repaved the I-5 portion by the paper mill by millerstown so going 125 is nice and smooth ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! I can do it in 75mins. They repaved the I-5 portion by the paper mill by millerstown so going 125 is nice and smooth ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2108</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2108</guid>
		<description>Shit, I thought Bret was talking about Pat Payne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shit, I thought Bret was talking about Pat Payne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2107</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2107</guid>
		<description>This is off topic, but it's great to hear that Ben got the Ukiah Daily Journal job. Props.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is off topic, but it&#8217;s great to hear that Ben got the Ukiah Daily Journal job. Props.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>Also, after a good intellectual thrashing, cut some slack to the token conservative ODE columnist -- the role has been filled by some unbelievably talented drinkers and thinkers, who will remain nameless

Who may or may not have been named Bret and may or may not have been as hot as Rebecca Newell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, after a good intellectual thrashing, cut some slack to the token conservative ODE columnist &#8212; the role has been filled by some unbelievably talented drinkers and thinkers, who will remain nameless</p>
<p>Who may or may not have been named Bret and may or may not have been as hot as Rebecca Newell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajb</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2105</link>
		<dc:creator>ajb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 00:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2105</guid>
		<description>Danimal,

I understand the legal distinction, thanks so much.
It's the common sense of such a comparison, I question. 

If you don't like the law, organize some people, get  a bill written, and change the law.
But in the meantime, don't cry when you get a speeding ticket, and don't expect me to have a lot of sympathy for some Canadian tree farmer that gets deported back to Winnipeg.

-ajb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danimal,</p>
<p>I understand the legal distinction, thanks so much.<br />
It&#8217;s the common sense of such a comparison, I question. </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like the law, organize some people, get  a bill written, and change the law.<br />
But in the meantime, don&#8217;t cry when you get a speeding ticket, and don&#8217;t expect me to have a lot of sympathy for some Canadian tree farmer that gets deported back to Winnipeg.</p>
<p>-ajb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 23:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2104</guid>
		<description>Not to get off topic: but I'd like to point out I was questioning Olly's morals many years ago, and I won't give up that role without protest. 

Also, after a good intellectual thrashing, cut some slack to the token conservative ODE columnist -- the role has been filled by some unbelievably talented drinkers and thinkers, who will remain nameless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to get off topic: but I&#8217;d like to point out I was questioning Olly&#8217;s morals many years ago, and I won&#8217;t give up that role without protest. </p>
<p>Also, after a good intellectual thrashing, cut some slack to the token conservative ODE columnist &#8212; the role has been filled by some unbelievably talented drinkers and thinkers, who will remain nameless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danimal</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator>Danimal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 07:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2103</guid>
		<description>My modest proposal:  to offset illegal immigration from Mexico, we disallow a certain number of vacationing Americans from re-entering the States from Mexico.  I suspect this will improve the vitality of our workforce much as natural predation maintains the health of a herd of deer:  the old, the weak, and the pensioned will be culled off to hustle chiclets and wash dishes in Mexico, and in return we get Mexico's most determined, motivated, and resourceful human resources.

Seriously, those of you who, with a straight face, believe that people sneak over the border for welfare:  Have you ever met an illegal immigrant?  Have you ever met a person living on welfare?  I've met both, and I've found the former to be Mexican and highly motivated, and the latter to be American-born and highly (cough) lazy.  The former didn't have much, but was willing to do all he could to get more.  The latter, too, didn't have much, yet didn't seem to care if he ever got more, unless it came without effort on his part.  

There are plenty of reasons to criticize welfare, and there are bona fide drains on society.  But people who brave the U.S.-Mexico border time and time again are not the sort likely to become such drains.  Plenty of people born here are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My modest proposal:  to offset illegal immigration from Mexico, we disallow a certain number of vacationing Americans from re-entering the States from Mexico.  I suspect this will improve the vitality of our workforce much as natural predation maintains the health of a herd of deer:  the old, the weak, and the pensioned will be culled off to hustle chiclets and wash dishes in Mexico, and in return we get Mexico&#8217;s most determined, motivated, and resourceful human resources.</p>
<p>Seriously, those of you who, with a straight face, believe that people sneak over the border for welfare:  Have you ever met an illegal immigrant?  Have you ever met a person living on welfare?  I&#8217;ve met both, and I&#8217;ve found the former to be Mexican and highly motivated, and the latter to be American-born and highly (cough) lazy.  The former didn&#8217;t have much, but was willing to do all he could to get more.  The latter, too, didn&#8217;t have much, yet didn&#8217;t seem to care if he ever got more, unless it came without effort on his part.  </p>
<p>There are plenty of reasons to criticize welfare, and there are bona fide drains on society.  But people who brave the U.S.-Mexico border time and time again are not the sort likely to become such drains.  Plenty of people born here are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danimal</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2102</link>
		<dc:creator>Danimal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 07:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2102</guid>
		<description>Ajb--

You're comparing people who are commiting a federal misdemeanor(and if a repeat offender, a felony) with someone who jaywalks? Seriously?

Sure, that can be serious.  Both are malum prohibitum, i.e., bad because they are illegal.  Whereas rape or murder are malum in se -- bad in and of themselves.  Certain things are illegal just because we say so.  Others enjoy a near-universal agreement upon their inherent evilness.  

Like a cloud pattern, this distinction is easy enough to see once someone points it out, but it's tripping you up.  Who cares whether an offense is a municipal violation or a federal misdemeanor (oooh!) if it's only bad 'cause somebody said so?    I, being a bit of federalist, will respect the municipality ahead of Congress, if we're going that way.

Likewise, Kirsten got tripped up when she compared illegal immigration to murder.  The fact that there is an ongoing debate on the propriety of illegal immigration should make clear that, unlike murder, we don't have any kind of consensus on its inherent wrongness.  It's only bad because it's illegal.  Which is a stupid reason to frown on something.

I broke the speed limit for 83 consecutive minutes on I-5 this evening, at times by more than 20 miles per hour.  And here I sit, not murdering anyone.  But OH GOD, I broke the law!  Who's to say I won't sign up for welfare next???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajb&#8211;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re comparing people who are commiting a federal misdemeanor(and if a repeat offender, a felony) with someone who jaywalks? Seriously?</p>
<p>Sure, that can be serious.  Both are malum prohibitum, i.e., bad because they are illegal.  Whereas rape or murder are malum in se &#8212; bad in and of themselves.  Certain things are illegal just because we say so.  Others enjoy a near-universal agreement upon their inherent evilness.  </p>
<p>Like a cloud pattern, this distinction is easy enough to see once someone points it out, but it&#8217;s tripping you up.  Who cares whether an offense is a municipal violation or a federal misdemeanor (oooh!) if it&#8217;s only bad &#8217;cause somebody said so?    I, being a bit of federalist, will respect the municipality ahead of Congress, if we&#8217;re going that way.</p>
<p>Likewise, Kirsten got tripped up when she compared illegal immigration to murder.  The fact that there is an ongoing debate on the propriety of illegal immigration should make clear that, unlike murder, we don&#8217;t have any kind of consensus on its inherent wrongness.  It&#8217;s only bad because it&#8217;s illegal.  Which is a stupid reason to frown on something.</p>
<p>I broke the speed limit for 83 consecutive minutes on I-5 this evening, at times by more than 20 miles per hour.  And here I sit, not murdering anyone.  But OH GOD, I broke the law!  Who&#8217;s to say I won&#8217;t sign up for welfare next???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajb</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2101</link>
		<dc:creator>ajb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 01:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2101</guid>
		<description>"We don't and will never enforce jay walking, so get rid of it"

No, no, no!

People who jaywalk should be made to stand on street corners with giant sandwich-boards that read "I'm an idiot who can't push a walk button" on the front and  "Cross on the green, Not in between" on the back.

Alternately, we could just eliminate the hit and run laws for cars that strike pedestrians and let natural selection take over.

-ajb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We don&#8217;t and will never enforce jay walking, so get rid of it&#8221;</p>
<p>No, no, no!</p>
<p>People who jaywalk should be made to stand on street corners with giant sandwich-boards that read &#8220;I&#8217;m an idiot who can&#8217;t push a walk button&#8221; on the front and  &#8220;Cross on the green, Not in between&#8221; on the back.</p>
<p>Alternately, we could just eliminate the hit and run laws for cars that strike pedestrians and let natural selection take over.</p>
<p>-ajb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajb</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2100</link>
		<dc:creator>ajb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 01:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2100</guid>
		<description>"Jaywalkers are also breaking the law."

You're comparing people who are commiting a federal misdemeanor(and if a repeat offender, a felony) with someone who jaywalks? Seriously?

"Big of you, ajb. Thanks."
Sure thing.

All I ask is that you come legally.

"This is not a trick question: what's your opinion of the trade embargo against Cuba?"

If it served any purpose at all, that purpose ended when the Soviet Union collapsed.
I think it's kept around through a sense of (for lack of a better word) vindictiveness, and for political reasons (lots of anti-castro voters in Florida).

-ajb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Jaywalkers are also breaking the law.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re comparing people who are commiting a federal misdemeanor(and if a repeat offender, a felony) with someone who jaywalks? Seriously?</p>
<p>&#8220;Big of you, ajb. Thanks.&#8221;<br />
Sure thing.</p>
<p>All I ask is that you come legally.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is not a trick question: what&#8217;s your opinion of the trade embargo against Cuba?&#8221;</p>
<p>If it served any purpose at all, that purpose ended when the Soviet Union collapsed.<br />
I think it&#8217;s kept around through a sense of (for lack of a better word) vindictiveness, and for political reasons (lots of anti-castro voters in Florida).</p>
<p>-ajb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy D</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2099</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 00:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2099</guid>
		<description>F- lars. That guy isn't libertairian. And no, I don't want to shoot people, but since were a nation of compromising/pissing on the constitution, I thought it would be a fair trade. 
If there were no entitlements, then who would care if illegal immigrants came in? Racists? The Lazy? We should care is bad people were comming in, but as long as they did find jobs, no one would care. What I do care about is the lack of assimillation and the overuse of entitlements. 
The government is in a completly rediculous position half-assly enforcing immigration laws. I am much more worried about my gun rights, and my property (tax) rights than this subject. 

But yet, my arguments prove true that illegal immigration in its current form is a massive detriment to our society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F- lars. That guy isn&#8217;t libertairian. And no, I don&#8217;t want to shoot people, but since were a nation of compromising/pissing on the constitution, I thought it would be a fair trade.<br />
If there were no entitlements, then who would care if illegal immigrants came in? Racists? The Lazy? We should care is bad people were comming in, but as long as they did find jobs, no one would care. What I do care about is the lack of assimillation and the overuse of entitlements.<br />
The government is in a completly rediculous position half-assly enforcing immigration laws. I am much more worried about my gun rights, and my property (tax) rights than this subject. </p>
<p>But yet, my arguments prove true that illegal immigration in its current form is a massive detriment to our society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2098</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2098</guid>
		<description>Tyler thanks for comparing me to Lou Dobbs, for future reference I'd prefer Partick J, why not just go the extra yard and really make it worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler thanks for comparing me to Lou Dobbs, for future reference I&#8217;d prefer Partick J, why not just go the extra yard and really make it worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 19:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2097</guid>
		<description>Gabrielle, I think, has a decent proposal.  I guess the theory is that your tax ID will come back wrong if the guy/gal isn't legal, but I think being able to just ask is fine.

That said, I don't think it'll make much difference in most places.  The guy who runs the yard business that my folks use doesn't care if his employees are legal or not, and frankly neither does anyone else.

And, yeah, ending entitlements wouldn't likely reduce illegal immigration by that much, but hey, if you can sell ending entitlements as a solution to the hot-button xenophobia issue of the day, at least you've ended entitlements.  Replace them with the EITC, that'd be fine.

And, again, we're back to the incentives issue: so long as the US has a much, much stronger economy than Mexico there will be a major incentive to border hop, even at the risk of getting caught.  Measures sufficient to make that not the case, short of helping bring Mexico's economy into at least the 20th century, will be both draconian and extremely costly.  

Where the cost of running for the border is P(Caught)*C(Punishment) where C is some monetarized cost (from lost wages, imprisonment, etc) folks will try it so long as that remains below the gains for being here in the first place.  Raising either is costly to the US, likely more costly than the illegals on welfare.  

We know deportation doesn't work, folks will just come back.  Guy who worked at a construction company in Hood River with former OCer and new Ukiah Daily Journal employee Ben Brown was deported back to Mexico three times before coming to the states legally to stay.  He walked.  To Oregon.  From Monterrey.  Thrice.  That's how much better things are here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabrielle, I think, has a decent proposal.  I guess the theory is that your tax ID will come back wrong if the guy/gal isn&#8217;t legal, but I think being able to just ask is fine.</p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll make much difference in most places.  The guy who runs the yard business that my folks use doesn&#8217;t care if his employees are legal or not, and frankly neither does anyone else.</p>
<p>And, yeah, ending entitlements wouldn&#8217;t likely reduce illegal immigration by that much, but hey, if you can sell ending entitlements as a solution to the hot-button xenophobia issue of the day, at least you&#8217;ve ended entitlements.  Replace them with the EITC, that&#8217;d be fine.</p>
<p>And, again, we&#8217;re back to the incentives issue: so long as the US has a much, much stronger economy than Mexico there will be a major incentive to border hop, even at the risk of getting caught.  Measures sufficient to make that not the case, short of helping bring Mexico&#8217;s economy into at least the 20th century, will be both draconian and extremely costly.  </p>
<p>Where the cost of running for the border is P(Caught)*C(Punishment) where C is some monetarized cost (from lost wages, imprisonment, etc) folks will try it so long as that remains below the gains for being here in the first place.  Raising either is costly to the US, likely more costly than the illegals on welfare.  </p>
<p>We know deportation doesn&#8217;t work, folks will just come back.  Guy who worked at a construction company in Hood River with former OCer and new Ukiah Daily Journal employee Ben Brown was deported back to Mexico three times before coming to the states legally to stay.  He walked.  To Oregon.  From Monterrey.  Thrice.  That&#8217;s how much better things are here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabrielle</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2096</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabrielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 19:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2096</guid>
		<description>Oops, that was me I didn't mean to be anonymous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, that was me I didn&#8217;t mean to be anonymous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2095</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 19:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2095</guid>
		<description>"Also, I'm willing to compromise. If there was reciprocity with concealed weapons lisences like there is with drivers lisences,and repealed the gun control acts of 1968 and 1986, I would offer no more contest to whatever immigration policies."

Andy: So, am I reading this right, you plan on going and shooting them yourself?? 

And if you are talking minuteman, do you realize that as good a concept as minutemen may be, they are crossing private property lines with no respect to the owners rights?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Also, I&#8217;m willing to compromise. If there was reciprocity with concealed weapons lisences like there is with drivers lisences,and repealed the gun control acts of 1968 and 1986, I would offer no more contest to whatever immigration policies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Andy: So, am I reading this right, you plan on going and shooting them yourself?? </p>
<p>And if you are talking minuteman, do you realize that as good a concept as minutemen may be, they are crossing private property lines with no respect to the owners rights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnC</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2094</link>
		<dc:creator>johnC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2094</guid>
		<description>Andy, say this to yourself 1000 times. People don't cross the border for entitlements. Entitlements do not amout to much per person and illegals use them at a lower rate than the resident poor.


As far as being a socialist, I don't think of having an educated population as socialist. Read the republican platform if you don't believe me.


"Also, I'm willing to compromise. If there was reciprocity with concealed weapons lisences like there is with drivers lisences,and repealed the gun control acts of 1968 and 1986, I would offer no more contest to whatever immigration policies."


What the hell?!? Also, you forgot to throw in gay marriage, Lars Larson would be ashamed of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, say this to yourself 1000 times. People don&#8217;t cross the border for entitlements. Entitlements do not amout to much per person and illegals use them at a lower rate than the resident poor.</p>
<p>As far as being a socialist, I don&#8217;t think of having an educated population as socialist. Read the republican platform if you don&#8217;t believe me.</p>
<p>&#8220;Also, I&#8217;m willing to compromise. If there was reciprocity with concealed weapons lisences like there is with drivers lisences,and repealed the gun control acts of 1968 and 1986, I would offer no more contest to whatever immigration policies.&#8221;</p>
<p>What the hell?!? Also, you forgot to throw in gay marriage, Lars Larson would be ashamed of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabrielle</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2093</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabrielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/12/01/it-may-seem-ridiculous-to-talk-about-mexican-terrorists-but/#comment-2093</guid>
		<description>One feasible aspect of a solution would be to allow employers to check the status of the people they hire. In Oregon, right now, it is illegal to check the legal status of any employee. You can ask if they are a felon but not if they are a citizen, or otherwise legal to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One feasible aspect of a solution would be to allow employers to check the status of the people they hire. In Oregon, right now, it is illegal to check the legal status of any employee. You can ask if they are a felon but not if they are a citizen, or otherwise legal to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
