Comments on: Wisconsin Now Apportioning Budgets Using Roulette Wheel

By: Tyler

Tyler — Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:17:15 +0000

Andy:

Didn’t you come into the office the other day and admit that you only work eight or so hours a week?

Sorry, I’m not trying to be a dick. Your love of anorexic girls on facebook makes me smile.

By: Andy D

Andy D — Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:55:40 +0000

Sorry I’m not a grammer nazi - I work for a living.

By: Ian

Ian — Tue, 22 Nov 2005 07:38:00 +0000

I don’t see why “insufficient itemization” is an invalid charge in the case of CFACT or, here at UO, OSPIRG. Remember OSPIRG’s unwillingness to itemize over $100,000 in funds? Massive line items are, particularly with organizations such as these, highly suspicious. Is CFACT anything more than a conservative PIRG?

Just asking questions… it wouldn’t surprise me at all if it were a purely political move on the part of SSFC.

This is different, of course, from Eden Cortez’s silly complaint that we go into more detail as to what the OC was going to spend ~$300 in office supplies on.

Also, $385,000 is a shit-ton of money.

By: Ian

Ian — Tue, 22 Nov 2005 06:55:21 +0000

I’m sure he would’ve had he seen them on facebook.

By: Sailor Republica

Sailor Republica — Tue, 22 Nov 2005 05:51:12 +0000

At least, Andy, you didn’t call the interns “large”.

By: Andy D

Andy D — Tue, 22 Nov 2005 04:29:08 +0000

While the budget is large, so is the number of interns they have. We have to know what they had been previously funded, and it sounds like it was a whole hell of a lot more than 3k!

By: Timothy

Timothy — Tue, 22 Nov 2005 01:00:20 +0000

Wow, I hadn’t heard about the “insufficient itemization” thing. Nice to know that every other student group is allowed “office supplies” but we aren’t. Heh.