http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/09/13/is-that-a-technical-term-senator/ Free Minds, Free Markets, Free Booze Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:04:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/09/13/is-that-a-technical-term-senator/#comment-1562 Danimal Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:28:09 +0000 http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/09/13/is-that-a-technical-term-senator/#comment-1562 No, it can be antidisestablishmentareversed and remanded. No, it can be antidisestablishmentareversed and remanded.

]]> http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/09/13/is-that-a-technical-term-senator/#comment-1561 bryan Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:22:50 +0000 http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/09/13/is-that-a-technical-term-senator/#comment-1561 I've been led to understand that a supercalifragilisticexpialidotious precedent is technically unassailable. I’ve been led to understand that a supercalifragilisticexpialidotious precedent is technically unassailable.

]]> http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/09/13/is-that-a-technical-term-senator/#comment-1560 Timothy Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:47:01 +0000 http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/09/13/is-that-a-technical-term-senator/#comment-1560 Thanks, I figured it was something like that. Thanks, I figured it was something like that.

]]> http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/09/13/is-that-a-technical-term-senator/#comment-1559 Danimal Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:11:53 +0000 http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/09/13/is-that-a-technical-term-senator/#comment-1559 Technically, Tim, if it's a super-duper precedent it has to be be overly-doverly-topsy-turned-diddly-diddly to lose legal force. Technically, Tim, if it’s a super-duper precedent it has to be be overly-doverly-topsy-turned-diddly-diddly to lose legal force.

]]>