<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Issue</title>
	<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/</link>
	<description>Free Minds, Free Markets, Free Booze</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh M.</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Damn metric system!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn metric system!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-651</guid>
		<description>Math has never been our strong suit, Josh. I blame it on Ruff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Math has never been our strong suit, Josh. I blame it on Ruff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh M.</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2005 17:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-650</guid>
		<description>This may just be nitpicking, but the mission statement speaks of the Commentator's "nineteen-year existence," yet the magazine was founded in 1983.  So unless this issue creates some type of time warp while reading, I just don't think that's right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may just be nitpicking, but the mission statement speaks of the Commentator&#8217;s &#8220;nineteen-year existence,&#8221; yet the magazine was founded in 1983.  So unless this issue creates some type of time warp while reading, I just don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-649</guid>
		<description>I lead a rampant life of petty crime, Bret  is mostly doing the killer-for-hire thing these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lead a rampant life of petty crime, Bret  is mostly doing the killer-for-hire thing these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 03:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-648</guid>
		<description>I almost forgot about this:

Jon Collegio? For fuck's sake, the guy's been gone since '98 or '99, Casey. What the fuck happened to Tim Dreier or Bret Jacobson for that matter. I can fill you in if you're interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I almost forgot about this:</p>
<p>Jon Collegio? For fuck&#8217;s sake, the guy&#8217;s been gone since &#8216;98 or &#8216;99, Casey. What the fuck happened to Tim Dreier or Bret Jacobson for that matter. I can fill you in if you&#8217;re interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 03:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-647</guid>
		<description>Mason is 28 ... almost 29.

By the way, I read Dave's comics as he worked on them at the bar (yeah, surprise) and I thought they were fucking hilarious. Lighten up, Clint. Have a drink or twelve.

That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mason is 28 &#8230; almost 29.</p>
<p>By the way, I read Dave&#8217;s comics as he worked on them at the bar (yeah, surprise) and I thought they were fucking hilarious. Lighten up, Clint. Have a drink or twelve.</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danimal</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Danimal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-646</guid>
		<description>Olly, you mispelled "res ipsa loquitur."  I'm disgusted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olly, you mispelled &#8220;res ipsa loquitur.&#8221;  I&#8217;m disgusted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-645</guid>
		<description>How old is Mason?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How old is Mason?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-644</guid>
		<description>Quiroz story has a typo in the first line. No pun intended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quiroz story has a typo in the first line. No pun intended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 20:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-643</guid>
		<description>That is Jeff Jarvis...I thought so.  

Clint: That comic is hilarious, I think you are humor deprived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is Jeff Jarvis&#8230;I thought so.  </p>
<p>Clint: That comic is hilarious, I think you are humor deprived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Personally, I thought the Dorms article was great. Was it "necessary"? Maybe not, but it was damn funny. I do question the comparison of PBR and HRD, though. The blue ribbon-winning champion shouldn't be compared to crap like HRD.

Tyler, there are some tiny things I noticed that you may want to look at before you send it off to be printed:
* In the second-to-bottom line of the first column of your editorial there is an n with a tilde over it (enye?) that seems out of place.
* Churchill's name is misspelled on page 8 in the second paragraph.
* The line between Mishima and Alger's responses is thinner than the others. (this is obviously very important, heh)
* The bottom of the Crosswhite Heightwatch box is missing half of a line. This might just be the .pdf??
* The "to celebrate" and "liquid courage" sentences are missing periods on page 9 (I should've seen this yesterday, damn.)
* I was incredibly inconsistent in my capitalization of "the" in the Blueprint for Revolution piece. In the same piece there are also some references to the OC that are missing smallcaps.
* Jarvis' tits aren't big enough.

Meh. These piddly things don't take anything away from the issue; it's a damn good one. Especially the editorial and Quiroz story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I thought the Dorms article was great. Was it &#8220;necessary&#8221;? Maybe not, but it was damn funny. I do question the comparison of PBR and HRD, though. The blue ribbon-winning champion shouldn&#8217;t be compared to crap like HRD.</p>
<p>Tyler, there are some tiny things I noticed that you may want to look at before you send it off to be printed:<br />
* In the second-to-bottom line of the first column of your editorial there is an n with a tilde over it (enye?) that seems out of place.<br />
* Churchill&#8217;s name is misspelled on page 8 in the second paragraph.<br />
* The line between Mishima and Alger&#8217;s responses is thinner than the others. (this is obviously very important, heh)<br />
* The bottom of the Crosswhite Heightwatch box is missing half of a line. This might just be the .pdf??<br />
* The &#8220;to celebrate&#8221; and &#8220;liquid courage&#8221; sentences are missing periods on page 9 (I should&#8217;ve seen this yesterday, damn.)<br />
* I was incredibly inconsistent in my capitalization of &#8220;the&#8221; in the Blueprint for Revolution piece. In the same piece there are also some references to the OC that are missing smallcaps.<br />
* Jarvis&#8217; tits aren&#8217;t big enough.</p>
<p>Meh. These piddly things don&#8217;t take anything away from the issue; it&#8217;s a damn good one. Especially the editorial and Quiroz story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-641</guid>
		<description>He must be glutting for punishment.  The Libertarians in Oregon are a joke and Kevin Mannix is determined to put his own ambitions ahead of the good of his party.  I guess the initative process is easy pickings for anti-tax measures though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He must be glutting for punishment.  The Libertarians in Oregon are a joke and Kevin Mannix is determined to put his own ambitions ahead of the good of his party.  I guess the initative process is easy pickings for anti-tax measures though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-640</guid>
		<description>Collegio is back in Oregon working on campaigns after a run at Americans for Tax Reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Collegio is back in Oregon working on campaigns after a run at Americans for Tax Reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint T.</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-639</guid>
		<description>Is there some inside joke thing I'm not in on.. or are those comics by Dave Kirk just downright not funny?

Otherwise the issue was pretty good.  Thank you Ben Brown and Tyler Graf for taking a parting shot at Quiroz.. even though I'm sure thats not what you were doing.

Hey, and could Adrian Gilmore have taken Dan Dinan if the police wouldn't have intervened?  I mean, I haven't really seen either of them up close before.. but Dan does look pretty damn intimidating in that purple outfit.

Did I say intimidating?  I mean pussy-ass-bitch.  I get those two confused sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there some inside joke thing I&#8217;m not in on.. or are those comics by Dave Kirk just downright not funny?</p>
<p>Otherwise the issue was pretty good.  Thank you Ben Brown and Tyler Graf for taking a parting shot at Quiroz.. even though I&#8217;m sure thats not what you were doing.</p>
<p>Hey, and could Adrian Gilmore have taken Dan Dinan if the police wouldn&#8217;t have intervened?  I mean, I haven&#8217;t really seen either of them up close before.. but Dan does look pretty damn intimidating in that purple outfit.</p>
<p>Did I say intimidating?  I mean pussy-ass-bitch.  I get those two confused sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-638</guid>
		<description>Not bad, but not great.  Is it really necessary to do another story about the dorms?  By the way, what became of Jon Collegio?  That guy had chops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not bad, but not great.  Is it really necessary to do another story about the dorms?  By the way, what became of Jon Collegio?  That guy had chops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-637</guid>
		<description>Also, University of Colorado is CU, not UC.  Geeze, Ruff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, University of Colorado is CU, not UC.  Geeze, Ruff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/03/24/new-issue/#comment-636</guid>
		<description>Contents page: I'd up the inset on the text boxes to move the text off the borders.

Editorial: "...anxious for us to get to the point" should be "eager for us to get to the point."  Also, you can make a long dash by holding shift-option and hitting the dash key.  Or maybe it's just option, I forget.

Nobody: Yeah, see the long dash thing above.

Great issue, but try a 0.125 inset on all the boxes with text in them, makes things a lot easier to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contents page: I&#8217;d up the inset on the text boxes to move the text off the borders.</p>
<p>Editorial: &#8220;&#8230;anxious for us to get to the point&#8221; should be &#8220;eager for us to get to the point.&#8221;  Also, you can make a long dash by holding shift-option and hitting the dash key.  Or maybe it&#8217;s just option, I forget.</p>
<p>Nobody: Yeah, see the long dash thing above.</p>
<p>Great issue, but try a 0.125 inset on all the boxes with text in them, makes things a lot easier to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
