<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attention, Ink-Stained Wretches!</title>
	<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/01/24/attention-ink-stained-wretches/</link>
	<description>Free Minds, Free Markets, Free Booze</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: equity loan rates home mortgage loan new jersey</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/01/24/attention-ink-stained-wretches/#comment-6866</link>
		<dc:creator>equity loan rates home mortgage loan new jersey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 20:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/01/24/attention-ink-stained-wretches/#comment-6866</guid>
		<description>Antares removals comets.desiccate complicated severity subtractions.Schubert phosphoric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antares removals comets.desiccate complicated severity subtractions.Schubert phosphoric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Aiken</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/01/24/attention-ink-stained-wretches/#comment-4441</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Aiken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/01/24/attention-ink-stained-wretches/#comment-4441</guid>
		<description>I don't think the administration's beef is with the "content" of the message.  The issue is with the time/manner/place of the communication of said message.

In general, state employees are not supposed to promote personal beliefs via state resources. 

In this instance, the sticker reads "Support the Troops."

What if the sticker read "S[p]it on the Troops"?  What if it read "Support Al Qaeda"?

That being said, only someone who supports terrorism and/or hates America would complain about someone supporting U.S. troops.  Or it could've been a GTF.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the administration&#8217;s beef is with the &#8220;content&#8221; of the message.  The issue is with the time/manner/place of the communication of said message.</p>
<p>In general, state employees are not supposed to promote personal beliefs via state resources. </p>
<p>In this instance, the sticker reads &#8220;Support the Troops.&#8221;</p>
<p>What if the sticker read &#8220;S[p]it on the Troops&#8221;?  What if it read &#8220;Support Al Qaeda&#8221;?</p>
<p>That being said, only someone who supports terrorism and/or hates America would complain about someone supporting U.S. troops.  Or it could&#8217;ve been a GTF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/01/24/attention-ink-stained-wretches/#comment-4440</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/01/24/attention-ink-stained-wretches/#comment-4440</guid>
		<description>M-Dog, the key word here is "employees."

Faculty are employees, too.  FIRE protects them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M-Dog, the key word here is &#8220;employees.&#8221;</p>
<p>Faculty are employees, too.  FIRE protects them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WWB</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/01/24/attention-ink-stained-wretches/#comment-4439</link>
		<dc:creator>WWB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/01/24/attention-ink-stained-wretches/#comment-4439</guid>
		<description>I'm sure you're right about the UO's legal right to ban the employee's displays -- Reynolds said as much on the air. But this need not be reduced to legalities. 

What the UO did was simply stupid: bending over backward to appease the ruin-it-for-everybody jerks who claim to see no light between the phrase "support our troops" and the sentiment "support this war." 

(In fact, I thought (most of) the left had made great pains to at least mention their support for the troops -- seeing as how spitting on veterans in the 60's didn't earn them any accolades.)

The admin. could allow those stickers if they wanted. They should at least be persuaded to reconsider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re right about the UO&#8217;s legal right to ban the employee&#8217;s displays &#8212; Reynolds said as much on the air. But this need not be reduced to legalities. </p>
<p>What the UO did was simply stupid: bending over backward to appease the ruin-it-for-everybody jerks who claim to see no light between the phrase &#8220;support our troops&#8221; and the sentiment &#8220;support this war.&#8221; </p>
<p>(In fact, I thought (most of) the left had made great pains to at least mention their support for the troops &#8212; seeing as how spitting on veterans in the 60&#8217;s didn&#8217;t earn them any accolades.)</p>
<p>The admin. could allow those stickers if they wanted. They should at least be persuaded to reconsider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danimal</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/01/24/attention-ink-stained-wretches/#comment-4438</link>
		<dc:creator>Danimal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 02:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/01/24/attention-ink-stained-wretches/#comment-4438</guid>
		<description>"The UO also owns the residence halls and they have Kerry support signs in their windows, as well as the famous "Fuck Bush" sign, and the UO defended that student's right to free speech against angry community members."

M-Dog, the key word here is "employees."  The U can't touch student speech, regardless of what Mason Quiroz tells you.  Employees come under an entirely different line of cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The UO also owns the residence halls and they have Kerry support signs in their windows, as well as the famous &#8220;Fuck Bush&#8221; sign, and the UO defended that student&#8217;s right to free speech against angry community members.&#8221;</p>
<p>M-Dog, the key word here is &#8220;employees.&#8221;  The U can&#8217;t touch student speech, regardless of what Mason Quiroz tells you.  Employees come under an entirely different line of cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M-Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/01/24/attention-ink-stained-wretches/#comment-4437</link>
		<dc:creator>M-Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2005/01/24/attention-ink-stained-wretches/#comment-4437</guid>
		<description>"The trucks are part of a public institution.
Under state law... public employees can not use state resources to spread political messages."

The UO also owns the residence halls and they have Kerry support signs in their windows, as well as the famous "Fuck Bush" sign, and the UO defended that student's right to free speech against angry community members. 

"The university determined that some may view the yellow ribbons as a political statement...threfore (sic) they demanded that all those stickers be removed."

Note to UO:  Please try not to ban the American flag from campus. Some view that as a political statement, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The trucks are part of a public institution.<br />
Under state law&#8230; public employees can not use state resources to spread political messages.&#8221;</p>
<p>The UO also owns the residence halls and they have Kerry support signs in their windows, as well as the famous &#8220;Fuck Bush&#8221; sign, and the UO defended that student&#8217;s right to free speech against angry community members. </p>
<p>&#8220;The university determined that some may view the yellow ribbons as a political statement&#8230;threfore (sic) they demanded that all those stickers be removed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Note to UO:  Please try not to ban the American flag from campus. Some view that as a political statement, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
