<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ze Didn&#8217;t Start The Fire</title>
	<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/</link>
	<description>Free Minds, Free Markets, Free Booze</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2817</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2817</guid>
		<description>Also, Timbo, I have the same problem with the pronunciation of "hir" as compared to "her." 
And Jan, I love WZF! Awesome. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Timbo, I have the same problem with the pronunciation of &#8220;hir&#8221; as compared to &#8220;her.&#8221;<br />
And Jan, I love WZF! Awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2816</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2816</guid>
		<description>Olly, I can't believe you're supporting using "them" as a non-gendered singular pronoun. I'm disappointed. 

I personally advocate the use of passive voice, "it," "one," or, if I must, "he/she" when referring to a generic person or a person of unknown gender. But though I am trying to respect Toby's (there's your genitive, Olly) wishes, well, we *know* what gender Toby is. Also, we could just constantly refer to Toby as Toby and thereby avoid pronouns completely ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olly, I can&#8217;t believe you&#8217;re supporting using &#8220;them&#8221; as a non-gendered singular pronoun. I&#8217;m disappointed. </p>
<p>I personally advocate the use of passive voice, &#8220;it,&#8221; &#8220;one,&#8221; or, if I must, &#8220;he/she&#8221; when referring to a generic person or a person of unknown gender. But though I am trying to respect Toby&#8217;s (there&#8217;s your genitive, Olly) wishes, well, we *know* what gender Toby is. Also, we could just constantly refer to Toby as Toby and thereby avoid pronouns completely &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timbo</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2815</link>
		<dc:creator>Timbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2815</guid>
		<description>How do you pronouce 'hir'?  My mouth wants to say it just like I'd say 'her'.  Or maybe 'here'.  So how would you tell the difference?  Either way, here's a rule of thumb:  If people get your new word confused with one of the old words it's meant to replace, then you've made a poor choice for a new word.

Also, wiktionary.com might be of interest.  It's by the folks that bring us wikipedia.org, the best idea in recent memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you pronouce &#8216;hir&#8217;?  My mouth wants to say it just like I&#8217;d say &#8216;her&#8217;.  Or maybe &#8216;here&#8217;.  So how would you tell the difference?  Either way, here&#8217;s a rule of thumb:  If people get your new word confused with one of the old words it&#8217;s meant to replace, then you&#8217;ve made a poor choice for a new word.</p>
<p>Also, wiktionary.com might be of interest.  It&#8217;s by the folks that bring us wikipedia.org, the best idea in recent memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2814</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2814</guid>
		<description>So, clearly he's a he if his parents say he's a he. But he wants to be a ze despite his he status. Therefore, what ze has actually accomplished in the end is identifying as a he -- and misspelling it.

Out of respect for hir, I will use the gender-neutral form of this: WZF?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, clearly he&#8217;s a he if his parents say he&#8217;s a he. But he wants to be a ze despite his he status. Therefore, what ze has actually accomplished in the end is identifying as a he &#8212; and misspelling it.</p>
<p>Out of respect for hir, I will use the gender-neutral form of this: WZF?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olly</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2813</link>
		<dc:creator>Olly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2813</guid>
		<description>Parents? Fascists, more like! They're trying to dictate his - shit, hang on a second - trying to dictate the gender identity belonging to hir!

(See what I mean? We really need a genitive here.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parents? Fascists, more like! They&#8217;re trying to dictate his - shit, hang on a second - trying to dictate the gender identity belonging to hir!</p>
<p>(See what I mean? We really need a genitive here.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mene</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2812</link>
		<dc:creator>Mene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2812</guid>
		<description>(After reading the actual link)...hell, one of HM's mothers calls him a "him."

Problem solved: Ask the parents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(After reading the actual link)&#8230;hell, one of HM&#8217;s mothers calls him a &#8220;him.&#8221;</p>
<p>Problem solved: Ask the parents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mene</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2811</link>
		<dc:creator>Mene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2811</guid>
		<description>Yes, because the english language isn't confusing enough already, we at the University of Oregon are fully committed to making everyone's head hurt just that much more.

Curse you, ASUO pawns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, because the english language isn&#8217;t confusing enough already, we at the University of Oregon are fully committed to making everyone&#8217;s head hurt just that much more.</p>
<p>Curse you, ASUO pawns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olly</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2810</link>
		<dc:creator>Olly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2810</guid>
		<description>Gosh, you typed the whole alphabet. 

I can certainly understand not wanting to be called "it". "They", I think, would be non-gendered without being non-human, although it would be clunky - and it still wouldn't make us sound very "complex", would it? 

Committed as I am to supporting Hill-Meyer's pronounical wishes, though, ze has left me slightly confused. What's the genitive form? Or are we left with constructions like "the hilarity ensuing from the ridiculous made-up word belonging to hir"? Because that's going to make things tricky.

(We're going to need a bigger boat! With some more words in it!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, you typed the whole alphabet. </p>
<p>I can certainly understand not wanting to be called &#8220;it&#8221;. &#8220;They&#8221;, I think, would be non-gendered without being non-human, although it would be clunky - and it still wouldn&#8217;t make us sound very &#8220;complex&#8221;, would it? </p>
<p>Committed as I am to supporting Hill-Meyer&#8217;s pronounical wishes, though, ze has left me slightly confused. What&#8217;s the genitive form? Or are we left with constructions like &#8220;the hilarity ensuing from the ridiculous made-up word belonging to hir&#8221;? Because that&#8217;s going to make things tricky.</p>
<p>(We&#8217;re going to need a bigger boat! With some more words in it!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2809</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2809</guid>
		<description>Jan: OSPIRG, Anything done by the Cultural Forum ever.

Nongendered style:  I don't see what the big fucking problem is, we already have a nongendered pronoun in English, "it."  That's right, if you're not satisfied with "he" or "she" or "him" or "her", then you can just get stuck with plain old "it", you do not get to invent words you fucking jokers.  Kleckner and his precious LGBTQABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ agenda be damned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jan: OSPIRG, Anything done by the Cultural Forum ever.</p>
<p>Nongendered style:  I don&#8217;t see what the big fucking problem is, we already have a nongendered pronoun in English, &#8220;it.&#8221;  That&#8217;s right, if you&#8217;re not satisfied with &#8220;he&#8221; or &#8220;she&#8221; or &#8220;him&#8221; or &#8220;her&#8221;, then you can just get stuck with plain old &#8220;it&#8221;, you do not get to invent words you fucking jokers.  Kleckner and his precious LGBTQABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ agenda be damned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2808</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/07/28/ze-didnt-start-the-fire/#comment-2808</guid>
		<description>Laaaaaaaaaaaaaame! Politically correct schmolitcally  correct.

On that subject, though, I have it on good authority that ASUO spent nearly $5,000 to hire the guy who organized that "My Own Story" event. That's about, oh, $5,000 for every person sitting in the audience! It leaves just one question: what incredibly ridiculous thing can ASUO possibly spend money on to top THAT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laaaaaaaaaaaaaame! Politically correct schmolitcally  correct.</p>
<p>On that subject, though, I have it on good authority that ASUO spent nearly $5,000 to hire the guy who organized that &#8220;My Own Story&#8221; event. That&#8217;s about, oh, $5,000 for every person sitting in the audience! It leaves just one question: what incredibly ridiculous thing can ASUO possibly spend money on to top THAT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
