<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More On &#8220;The Common Good&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/06/30/more-on-the-common-good/</link>
	<description>Free Minds, Free Markets, Free Booze</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danimal</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/06/30/more-on-the-common-good/#comment-2736</link>
		<dc:creator>Danimal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/06/30/more-on-the-common-good/#comment-2736</guid>
		<description>You're absolutely right, anonymous commenter.  She should have used economic terminology to satisfy a handful of bloggers not present at her speech, instead of a phrase everybody knows.  When will these politicians learn?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right, anonymous commenter.  She should have used economic terminology to satisfy a handful of bloggers not present at her speech, instead of a phrase everybody knows.  When will these politicians learn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/06/30/more-on-the-common-good/#comment-2735</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oregoncommentator.com/2004/06/30/more-on-the-common-good/#comment-2735</guid>
		<description>Its a shame Hillary didn't use the phrase 'public good' instead of 'common good'. Then we'd all be on the same page. Its a real distinction not just pedantic nitpicking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a shame Hillary didn&#8217;t use the phrase &#8216;public good&#8217; instead of &#8216;common good&#8217;. Then we&#8217;d all be on the same page. Its a real distinction not just pedantic nitpicking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
